From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] block: Fixes for bdi handling Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:22:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20170310102205.GA12421@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20170309101624.25901-1-jack@suse.cz> <7177cebf-8a9b-10d4-e991-5e43f4303ffc@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60793 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934055AbdCJKWJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:22:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7177cebf-8a9b-10d4-e991-5e43f4303ffc@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Omar Sandoval , Arthur Marsh , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu 09-03-17 09:41:01, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 03/09/2017 03:16 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hi! > > > > this is a second revision of the series fixing the most urgent bugs that were > > introduced by commit 165a5e22fafb "block: Move bdi_unregister() to > > del_gendisk()" and by 0dba1314d4f8 "scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name > > registration crashes". In fact before these commits we had a different set of > > problems in the code but they were less visible :). > > It was rather urgent to get those fixes in, so I already sent them off. > Not a huge deal, but it would be nice to add the atomic init fix as a > separate patch later on. OK, actually my followup fixes remove the counter completely so I guess we can just leave it as is. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR