From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix sysfs recursive removal splats in isci Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:23:08 -0400 Message-ID: <20170329152308.GA30385@htj.duckdns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f193.google.com ([209.85.161.193]:33151 "EHLO mail-yw0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752170AbdC2PXL (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:23:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" , James Bottomley , Dan Williams , John Garry , Jack Wang , Hannes Reinecke , Linux SCSI Mailinglist , Linux Kernel Mailinglist Hello, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:41:07AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > This series fixes a sysfs warning caused by isci not being able to cope with > recursive sysfs path removals which are in place since commit bcdde7e > ("sysfs: make __sysfs_remove_dir() recursive"). Thanks for fixing these. > The mvsas, aic94xx and pm8001 and hisi_sas patches have been compile tested > only hence they have no callstack of the affected path in their changelogs. > > I'm not sure whether to mark this patches as stable or not. I tend to say no > here, although we've seen complaints/bug reports on lkml and the scsi list. Given that the failures aren't critical or all that common (only happens on controller removal), I agree that not cc'ing stable is the right call here. Thanks. -- tejun