From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:13:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330041311.GA32392@lemon.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1k2774hht.fsf@oracle.com>
On Wed, 03/29 22:37, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Fam,
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > index fcfeddc..a5c7e67 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > @@ -2957,6 +2957,7 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> > rw_max = logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
> > } else
> > rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
> > + rw_max = min_not_zero(rw_max, logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max));
> >
> > /* Combine with controller limits */
> > q->limits.max_sectors = min(rw_max, queue_max_hw_sectors(q));
>
> Instead of updating rw_max twice, how about:
>
> } else
> rw_max = min_not_zero(logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max),
> BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
Yes, it is better. Is it okay to make the change when you apply?
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 4:41 [PATCH v2] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable Fam Zheng
2017-03-28 7:14 ` kbuild test robot
2017-03-30 2:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-03-30 4:13 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-03-30 15:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-03-31 4:05 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170330041311.GA32392@lemon.lan \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).