From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Thumshirn Subject: Re: [PATCH-v1 10/22] Fix PRLI ACC rsp for NVME Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:35:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20170420073535.GK6217@linux-x5ow.site> References: <20170420044641.10657-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com> <20170420044641.10657-11-jsmart2021@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48355 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S939257AbdDTHfj (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 03:35:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170420044641.10657-11-jsmart2021@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: jsmart2021@gmail.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me, martin.petersen@oracle.com, Dick Kennedy , James Smart On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:46:29PM -0700, jsmart2021@gmail.com wrote: > From: James Smart > > PRLI ACC from target is FCP oriented. > > Word 0 was wrong. This was noticed by another nvmet-fc vendor that > was testing the lpfc nvme-fc initiator with their target. > > Verified results with analyzer. > > PRLI > BC B5 56 56 22 61 04 00 00 61 00 00 01 29 00 00 20 00 00 00 > 00 10 FF FF 00 00 00 00 20 14 00 18 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 9C D8 DA C9 BC 95 75 75 > > ACC > BC B5 56 56 23 61 00 00 00 61 04 00 01 98 00 00 30 00 00 00 > 00 10 00 18 00 00 00 00 02 14 00 18 28 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 00 00 00 00 B0 6B 07 57 BC B5 75 75 > > Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy > Signed-off-by: James Smart > --- Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850