From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/23] blktrace: remove the unused block_rq_abort tracepoint Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:13:14 -0600 Message-ID: <20170420181313.GB22378@kernel.dk> References: <20170420140316.6546-1-hch@lst.de> <20170420140316.6546-23-hch@lst.de> <20170420152056.GP13676@linux-x5ow.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:36519 "EHLO mail-io0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S971233AbdDTSNQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:13:16 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id o22so88431343iod.3 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170420152056.GP13676@linux-x5ow.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Josef Bacik , James Smart , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com On Thu, Apr 20 2017, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > --- > > Just to be sure nothings forgotten, does this change need an update for > blktrace as well? blktrace doesn't use this event for anything internally, so the change is fine. -- Jens Axboe