From: firogm@gmail.com
To: dgilbert@interlog.com
Cc: dvyukov@google.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Firo Yang <firogm@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: sg: Fix mismatch in sg_get_rq_mark
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 22:52:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170516145244.19402-1-firogm@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Firo Yang <firogm@gmail.com>
This bug was reported by Andrey Konovalov with syzkaller:
Call Trace:
sg_finish_rem_req+0x2a6/0x320 drivers/scsi/sg.c:1839
sg_new_read+0x3c/0x430 drivers/scsi/sg.c:567
sg_read+0x866/0x1830 drivers/scsi/sg.c:455
__vfs_read+0x5c3/0x750 fs/read_write.c:450
vfs_read+0x11e/0x350 fs/read_write.c:473
SYSC_read fs/read_write.c:589
SyS_read+0xfb/0x230 fs/read_write.c:582
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:204
If there is nothing matched in the loop of list_for_each_entry,
at last the iteration variable 'resp' will point to
list_entry(&sfp->rq_list, typeof(resp), entry); it's not a valid
Sg_request. Finnally, 'resp' will be wrongly returned to the caller
function.
To fix it, add another return variable to record the correct
match and return it to the caller function.
Signed-off-by: Firo Yang <firogm@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sg.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
index 0a38ba0..74a9188 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
@@ -2065,7 +2065,7 @@ sg_unlink_reserve(Sg_fd * sfp, Sg_request * srp)
static Sg_request *
sg_get_rq_mark(Sg_fd * sfp, int pack_id)
{
- Sg_request *resp;
+ Sg_request *resp, *ret_resp = NULL;
unsigned long iflags;
write_lock_irqsave(&sfp->rq_list_lock, iflags);
@@ -2074,11 +2074,12 @@ sg_get_rq_mark(Sg_fd * sfp, int pack_id)
if ((1 == resp->done) && (!resp->sg_io_owned) &&
((-1 == pack_id) || (resp->header.pack_id == pack_id))) {
resp->done = 2; /* guard against other readers */
+ ret_resp = resp;
break;
}
}
write_unlock_irqrestore(&sfp->rq_list_lock, iflags);
- return resp;
+ return ret_resp;
}
/* always adds to end of list */
--
2.9.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-16 14:52 firogm [this message]
2017-05-16 14:55 ` [PATCH] scsi: sg: Fix mismatch in sg_get_rq_mark Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170516145244.19402-1-firogm@gmail.com \
--to=firogm@gmail.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox