From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hpsa: add support for legacy boards
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:11:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170712071121.GA5545@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1707111853330.9598@math.ut.ee>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:58:36PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > The 5i controller is probably too old for the hpsa driver to support.
> > The hpsa driver is looking for information to determine if the drive is online/offline and
> > this information is not available.
> >
> > What was the original issue you were having with the cciss driver?
>
> Christoph Hellwig updated block layer with "block: Make most
> scsi_req_init() calls implicit" and at first try, cciss was left without
> the needed initialization. This caused OOPS in udev probing but the
> system worked. The issue was fixed by Christoph quickly.
The original patch is from Bart, but otherwise correct.
> But he suggested it might be worth trying hpsa driver instead of cciss,
> with a longer term goal to to move users of cciss over to hpsa if
> possible. Now that I have tested it, it seems not all older cards are
> supported in hpsa - it's more than ID-s and interrupt masks.
Seems like it. And the idea behind this game is that we'd like to slowly
get rid of old request_fn based drivers. Given that hpsa supports very
similar hardware cciss is a target for removal once that hardware is
switched over. But it seems like we'll need more work in this area..
>
> --
> Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-12 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-11 6:49 [PATCH] hpsa: add support for legacy boards Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-11 14:25 ` Meelis Roos
2017-07-11 15:38 ` Don Brace
2017-07-11 15:58 ` Meelis Roos
2017-07-12 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-07-12 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-02 15:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170712071121.GA5545@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox