From: Benjamin Block <bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley"
<jejb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen"
<martin.petersen-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
Steffen Maier
<maier-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr()
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:19:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810221953.GC918@bblock-ThinkPad-W530> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810093531.GP24539-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:35:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:11:19PM +0200, Benjamin Block wrote:
> > Since struct bsg_command is now used in every calling case, we don't
> > need separation of arguments anymore that are contained in the same
> > bsg_command.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > block/bsg.c | 13 ++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> > index 8517361a9b3f..6ee2ffca808a 100644
> > --- a/block/bsg.c
> > +++ b/block/bsg.c
> > @@ -212,11 +212,12 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *op)
> > * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
> > */
> > static struct request *
> > -bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
> > - u8 *reply_buffer)
> > +bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct bsg_command *bc,
> > + fmode_t has_write_perm)
>
> I wish we could just rename the argument to mode and pass on the
> whole file->f_mode while you are cleaning up this code. That should
> be a separate patch, though.
>
Hmm, I did a quick pass through the code and the only place this seems
to be used, is to pass it to blk_verify_command() if the subcommand used
in the BSG request is a SCSI Command. And this has the same semantics.
So I guess this would require adjustments to the whole stack, as this is
also used from the 'normal' SG side of the world.
Beste Grüße / Best regards,
- Benjamin Block
--
Linux on z Systems Development / IBM Systems & Technology Group
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitz. AufsR.: Martina Koederitz / Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-iscsi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-09 14:11 [RFC PATCH 0/6] bsg: fix regression resulting in panics when sending commands via BSG and some sanity cleanups Benjamin Block
[not found] ` <cover.1502120928.git.bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] bsg: fix kernel panic resulting from missing allocation of a reply-buffer Benjamin Block
[not found] ` <9e67ce3fc2f3cd42e9e05b2753b00d6676f46ee1.1502120928.git.bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-10 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:10 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 22:45 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 9:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 13:49 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 15:32 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-11 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 16:01 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-13 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-14 16:33 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-14 16:32 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-16 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] bsg: assign sense_len instead of fixed SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE Benjamin Block
[not found] ` <2dd8381929af2037a6eec3086256f54f55c01e78.1502120928.git.bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-10 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] bsg: refactor ioctl to use regular BSG-command infrastructure for SG_IO Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 8:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-10 22:12 ` Benjamin Block
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for bsg_map_hdr() Benjamin Block
[not found] ` <6d4d39222a4b76f9b39ec52e0aca5b01a3fac9e1.1502120928.git.bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-10 8:26 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-08-10 9:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20170810093531.GP24539-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-10 22:19 ` Benjamin Block [this message]
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] bsg: reduce unnecessary arguments for blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq() Benjamin Block
2017-08-10 8:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
[not found] ` <d95177abfa703a4f77a3d8ddb218eaead465f5ec.1502120928.git.bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-10 9:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-09 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] bsg: scsi-transport: add compile-tests to prevent reply-buffer overflows Benjamin Block
[not found] ` <0f448e7771f438025de755530778691ff535e36c.1502120928.git.bblock-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-10 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170810221953.GC918@bblock-ThinkPad-W530 \
--to=bblock-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jejb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jthumshirn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maier-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=martin.petersen-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox