From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
peterz@infradead.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: possible circular locking dependency detected [was: linux-next: Tree for Aug 22]
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:39:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824043909.GL11771@tardis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823055517.GB728@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1905 bytes --]
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 02:55:17PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (08/23/17 13:35), Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > KERN_CONT and "\n" should not be together. "\n" flushes the cont
> > > buffer immediately.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm.. Not quite familiar with printk() stuffs, but I could see several
> > usages of printk(KERN_CONT "...\n") in kernel.
> >
> > Did a bit research myself, and I now think the inappropriate use is to
> > use a KERN_CONT printk *after* another printk ending with a "\n".
>
> ah... I didn't check __print_lock_name(): it leaves unflushed cont buffer
> upon the return. sorry, your code is correct.
>
So means printk(KERN_CON "..."); + printk(KERN_CONT "...\n") is a
correct usage, right? Thanks. Again, not familiar with printk stuff,
glad you can help me go through this ;-)
Regards,
Boqun
> -ss
>
> > > > printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
> > > > + } else if (cross_lock(src->instance)) {
> > > > + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario by crosslock:\n\n");
> > > > + printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n");
> > > > + printk(" ---- ----\n");
> > > > + printk(" lock(");
> > > > + __print_lock_name(target);
> > > > + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
> > > > + printk(" lock(");
> > > > + __print_lock_name(source);
> > > > + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
> > > > + printk(" lock(");
> > > > + __print_lock_name(parent == source ? target : parent);
> > > > + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
> > > > + printk(" unlock(");
> > > > + __print_lock_name(source);
> > > > + printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
> > > > + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
> > > > } else {
> > > > printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n");
> > > > printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n");
> > > > --
> > > > 2.14.1
> > > >
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170822183816.7925e0f8@canb.auug.org.au>
2017-08-22 10:47 ` possible circular locking dependency detected [was: linux-next: Tree for Aug 22] Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-22 21:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-23 0:03 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-23 2:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-23 2:59 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-23 3:49 ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-23 4:38 ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-23 4:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-23 5:35 ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-23 5:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-23 5:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-24 4:39 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2017-08-24 4:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-23 5:44 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-23 4:46 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-23 5:01 ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-23 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-30 5:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-30 5:43 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 6:15 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-30 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-30 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-30 8:53 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-30 12:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170824043909.GL11771@tardis \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox