From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve requeuing behavior
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:09:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824120944.GB23186@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823210535.1072-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 02:05:35PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Requests are unprepared and reprepared when being requeued. Avoid
> that requeuing resets .jiffies_at_alloc and .retries by initializing
> these two member variables from inside blk_get_request() and by
> preserving both member variables when preparing a request. This patch
> affects the requeuing behavior of scsi-sq and scsi-mq.
>
> Reported-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/18/923 ("Re: [BUG][bisected 270065e] linux-next fails to boot on powerpc")
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> Cc: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index ebc5c713ee37..8d1ec1e7b0e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1122,6 +1122,8 @@ void scsi_initialize_rq(struct request *rq)
> struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
>
> scsi_req_init(&cmd->req);
> + cmd->jiffies_at_alloc = jiffies;
> + cmd->retries = 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_initialize_rq);
How is this working for non-passthrough commands where we don't
call scsi_initialize_rq?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-24 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 21:05 [PATCH] Improve requeuing behavior Bart Van Assche
2017-08-24 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-08-24 16:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-24 16:57 ` hch
2017-08-24 17:17 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170824120944.GB23186@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox