From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ming Lei Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] block/scsi: safe SCSI quiescing Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:30:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20170901063007.GA2424@ming.t460p> References: <20170831172728.15817-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <1576539.niWZoWEnd8@natalenko.name> <20170831173833.GC5928@ming.t460p> <14328863.IIXMb7O2AM@natalenko.name> <20170901034532.GD16525@ming.t460p> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54028 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbdIAGaZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2017 02:30:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: oleksandr@natalenko.name Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , "James E . J . Bottomley" On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:24:46AM +0200, oleksandr@natalenko.name wrote: > Hi. > > 01.09.2017 05:45, Ming Lei wrote: > > Could you try the following patch against this patchset to see > > if there is still the warning? > > With this patch I wasn't able to trigger per-CPU-related warning. That is great! > > Also, for 8th patch you've written: > > > I have sent one delta patch in list, which will only call > > blk_queue_enter_live() iff SCSI device is in QUIESCE. > > This refers to the patch I've just tested, right? Yeah, you are right, thanks again for your test! I will prepare V2 and send it out soon. -- Ming