From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 00:44:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170915164456.9803-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170915164456.9803-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
If .queue_rq() returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE, blk-mq will rerun
the queue in the three situations:
1) if BLK_MQ_S_SCHED_RESTART is set
- queue is rerun after one rq is completed, see blk_mq_sched_restart()
which is run from blk_mq_free_request()
2) BLK_MQ_S_TAG_WAITING is set
- queue is rerun after one tag is freed
3) otherwise
- queue is run immediately in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list()
So calling blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() inside .queue_rq() doesn't make
sense because no matter it is called or not, the queue still will be
rerun soon in above three situations, and the busy req can be dispatched
again.
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-rq.c | 1 -
drivers/nvme/host/fc.c | 3 ---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 4 ----
3 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
index c6ebc5b1e00e..71422cea1c4a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
@@ -761,7 +761,6 @@ static blk_status_t dm_mq_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
/* Undo dm_start_request() before requeuing */
rq_end_stats(md, rq);
rq_completed(md, rq_data_dir(rq), false);
- blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 100/*ms*/);
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
}
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
index d2e882c0f496..17727eee5d5f 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
@@ -2041,9 +2041,6 @@ nvme_fc_start_fcp_op(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_fc_queue *queue,
return BLK_STS_OK;
busy:
- if (!(op->flags & FCOP_FLAGS_AEN) && queue->hctx)
- blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(queue->hctx, NVMEFC_QUEUE_DELAY);
-
return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 9cf6a80fe297..71d5bf1345c9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -2010,11 +2010,7 @@ static blk_status_t scsi_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
out:
switch (ret) {
case BLK_STS_OK:
- break;
case BLK_STS_RESOURCE:
- if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) == 0 &&
- !scsi_device_blocked(sdev))
- blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);
break;
default:
/*
--
2.9.5
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-15 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170915164456.9803-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
2017-09-15 16:44 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-09-15 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 12:40 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-18 15:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 5:43 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:04 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:55 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 18:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 22:44 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-20 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20 1:19 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:07 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170915164456.9803-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox