From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 5/6] block: support PREEMPT_ONLY Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 06:50:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20171002135024.GE19119@infradead.org> References: <20170930061214.10622-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20170930061214.10622-6-ming.lei@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170930061214.10622-6-ming.lei@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , "James E . J . Bottomley" , Bart Van Assche , Oleksandr Natalenko , Johannes Thumshirn , Cathy Avery , Martin Steigerwald , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , Bart Van Assche List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > +void blk_set_preempt_only(struct request_queue *q, bool preempt_only) > +{ > + blk_mq_freeze_queue(q); > + if (preempt_only) > + queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_PREEMPT_ONLY, q); > + else > + queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_PREEMPT_ONLY, q); > + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_preempt_only); What do you need the queue freeze for? > + /* > + * preempt_only flag has to be set after queue is frozen, > + * so it can be checked here lockless and safely > + */ > + if (blk_queue_preempt_only(q)) { We can always check a single bit flag safely, so I really don't understand that comment. > + if (!(flags & BLK_REQ_PREEMPT)) > + goto slow_path; > + } > + > if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter)) > return 0; > - > + slow_path: Also this looks a very spaghetti, why not: if (!blk_queue_preempt_only(q) || (flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT)) { if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter)) return 0; }