From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 6/7] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 02:05:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20171003090527.GC21184@infradead.org> References: <20170930102720.30219-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20170930102720.30219-7-ming.lei@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170930102720.30219-7-ming.lei@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Bart Van Assche , Laurence Oberman , Paolo Valente , Oleksandr Natalenko , Tom Nguyen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 06:27:19PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > SCSI devices use host-wide tagset, and the shared > driver tag space is often quite big. Meantime > there is also queue depth for each lun(.cmd_per_lun), > which is often small. > > So lots of requests may stay in sw queue, and we > always flush all belonging to same hw queue and > dispatch them all to driver, unfortunately it is > easy to cause queue busy because of the small > per-lun queue depth. Once these requests are flushed > out, they have to stay in hctx->dispatch, and no bio > merge can participate into these requests, and > sequential IO performance is hurted. > > This patch improves dispatching from sw queue when > there is per-request-queue queue depth by taking > request one by one from sw queue, just like the way > of IO scheduler. Once again, use your line length real estate for your change logs.. > +static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct request_queue *q, > + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) > +{ > + LIST_HEAD(rq_list); > + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = READ_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from); > + bool dispatched; > + > + do { > + struct request *rq; > + > + rq = blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx(hctx, ctx); This probably should be merged wit hthe patch that introduceѕ blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx. > + if (!rq) > + break; > + list_add(&rq->queuelist, &rq_list); Btw, do we really need to return a request from blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx, or would it be easier to just add it directly to the list passed as an argument. I did wonder that about the existing code already. > + > + /* round robin for fair dispatch */ > + ctx = blk_mq_next_ctx(hctx, rq->mq_ctx); > + > + dispatched = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list); > + } while (dispatched); > + > + if (!dispatched) > + WRITE_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from, ctx); No need for the dispatched argument, just write this as: } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list)); WRITE_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from, ctx); and do an early return instead of a break from inside the loop. > + } else if (!has_sched_dispatch && !q->queue_depth) { > + /* > + * If there is no per-request_queue depth, we > + * flush all requests in this hw queue, otherwise > + * pick up request one by one from sw queue for > + * avoiding to mess up I/O merge when dispatch > + * run out of resource, which can be triggered > + * easily by per-request_queue queue depth > + */ Use your 80 line real estate for comments..