From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 4/5] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 23:22:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012152240.GA9275@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82efff77-6b17-8bd8-e425-c143284ebb07@kernel.dk>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:52:12AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/12/2017 04:01 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:23:45AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:24:23PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> SCSI devices use host-wide tagset, and the shared driver tag space is
> >>> often quite big. Meantime there is also queue depth for each lun(
> >>> .cmd_per_lun), which is often small, for example, on both lpfc and
> >>> qla2xxx, .cmd_per_lun is just 3.
> >>>
> >>> So lots of requests may stay in sw queue, and we always flush all
> >>> belonging to same hw queue and dispatch them all to driver, unfortunately
> >>> it is easy to cause queue busy because of the small .cmd_per_lun.
> >>> Once these requests are flushed out, they have to stay in hctx->dispatch,
> >>> and no bio merge can participate into these requests, and sequential IO
> >>> performance is hurt a lot.
> >>>
> >>> This patch introduces blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx for dequeuing request from
> >>> sw queue so that we can dispatch them in scheduler's way, then we can
> >>> avoid to dequeue too many requests from sw queue when ->dispatch isn't
> >>> flushed completely.
> >>>
> >>> This patch improves dispatching from sw queue when there is per-request-queue
> >>> queue depth by taking request one by one from sw queue, just like the way
> >>> of IO scheduler.
> >>
> >> This still didn't address Jens' concern about using q->queue_depth as
> >> the heuristic for whether to do the full sw queue flush or one-by-one
> >> dispatch. The EWMA approach is a bit too complex for now, can you please
> >> try the heuristic of whether the driver ever returned BLK_STS_RESOURCE?
> >
> > That can be done easily, but I am not sure if it is good.
> >
> > For example, inside queue rq path of NVMe, kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) is
> > often used, if kmalloc() returns NULL just once, BLK_STS_RESOURCE
> > will be returned to blk-mq, then blk-mq will never do full sw
> > queue flush even when kmalloc() always succeed from that time
> > on.
>
> Have it be a bit more than a single bit, then. Reset it every x IOs or
> something like that, that'll be more representative of transient busy
> conditions anyway.
OK, that can be done via a simplified EWMA by considering
the dispatch result only.
I will address it in V6.
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 11:24 [PATCH V6 0/5] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance Ming Lei
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 1/5] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:10 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 2/5] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 3/5] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:15 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 4/5] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:23 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-10-12 10:01 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-12 14:52 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 15:22 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-10-12 15:24 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 15:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-12 15:37 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 15:49 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 5/5] blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are flushed Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:26 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171012152240.GA9275@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).