From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V7 4/6] blk-mq: introduce .get_budget and .put_budget in blk_mq_ops
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 02:37:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012183704.22326-5-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012183704.22326-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
For SCSI devices, there is often per-request-queue depth, which need
to be respected before queuing one request.
The current blk-mq always dequeues one request first, then calls .queue_rq()
to dispatch the request to lld. One obvious issue of this way is that I/O
merge may not be good, because when the per-request-queue depth can't be
respected, .queue_rq() has to return BLK_STS_RESOURCE, then this request
has to staty in hctx->dispatch list, and never got chance to participate
into I/O merge.
This patch introduces .get_budget and .put_budget callback in blk_mq_ops,
then we can try to get reserved budget first before dequeuing request.
Once we can't get budget for queueing I/O, we don't need to dequeue request
at all, then I/O merge can get improved a lot.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
block/blk-mq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
block/blk-mq.h | 2 +-
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 10 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index be29ba849408..bcf4773ee1ca 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -89,19 +89,32 @@ static bool blk_mq_sched_restart_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
return false;
}
-static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+static bool blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
do {
- struct request *rq = e->type->ops.mq.dispatch_request(hctx);
+ struct request *rq;
- if (!rq)
+ if (e->type->ops.mq.has_work &&
+ !e->type->ops.mq.has_work(hctx))
break;
+
+ if (q->mq_ops->get_budget && !q->mq_ops->get_budget(hctx))
+ return true;
+
+ rq = e->type->ops.mq.dispatch_request(hctx);
+ if (!rq) {
+ if (q->mq_ops->put_budget)
+ q->mq_ops->put_budget(hctx);
+ break;
+ }
list_add(&rq->queuelist, &rq_list);
- } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list));
+ } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
+
+ return false;
}
void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
@@ -110,6 +123,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
const bool has_sched_dispatch = e && e->type->ops.mq.dispatch_request;
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
+ bool run_queue = false;
/* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
if (unlikely(blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(q)))
@@ -143,13 +157,22 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
*/
if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
- if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list) && has_sched_dispatch)
- blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
+ if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false) &&
+ has_sched_dispatch)
+ run_queue = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
} else if (has_sched_dispatch) {
- blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
+ run_queue = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
} else {
blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
- blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
+ blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+ }
+
+ if (run_queue) {
+ if (!blk_mq_sched_needs_restart(hctx) &&
+ !test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_WAITING, &hctx->state)) {
+ blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
+ blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 076cbab9c3e0..e6e50a91f170 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1045,7 +1045,16 @@ static bool blk_mq_dispatch_wait_add(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
return true;
}
-bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list)
+static void blk_mq_put_budget(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool got_budget)
+{
+ struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
+
+ if (q->mq_ops->put_budget && got_budget)
+ q->mq_ops->put_budget(hctx);
+}
+
+bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
+ bool got_budget)
{
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
struct request *rq;
@@ -1054,6 +1063,8 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list)
if (list_empty(list))
return false;
+ WARN_ON(!list_is_singular(list) && got_budget);
+
/*
* Now process all the entries, sending them to the driver.
*/
@@ -1071,15 +1082,25 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list)
* The initial allocation attempt failed, so we need to
* rerun the hardware queue when a tag is freed.
*/
- if (!blk_mq_dispatch_wait_add(hctx))
+ if (!blk_mq_dispatch_wait_add(hctx)) {
+ blk_mq_put_budget(hctx, got_budget);
break;
+ }
/*
* It's possible that a tag was freed in the window
* between the allocation failure and adding the
* hardware queue to the wait queue.
*/
- if (!blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, &hctx, false))
+ if (!blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, &hctx, false)) {
+ blk_mq_put_budget(hctx, got_budget);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!got_budget) {
+ if (q->mq_ops->get_budget &&
+ !q->mq_ops->get_budget(hctx))
break;
}
@@ -1577,6 +1598,11 @@ static void __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
if (!blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, NULL, false))
goto insert;
+ if (q->mq_ops->get_budget && !q->mq_ops->get_budget(hctx)) {
+ blk_mq_put_driver_tag(rq);
+ goto insert;
+ }
+
new_cookie = request_to_qc_t(hctx, rq);
/*
@@ -2577,6 +2603,9 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
if (!set->ops->queue_rq)
return -EINVAL;
+ if ((!!set->ops->get_budget) != (!!set->ops->put_budget))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (set->queue_depth > BLK_MQ_MAX_DEPTH) {
pr_info("blk-mq: reduced tag depth to %u\n",
BLK_MQ_MAX_DEPTH);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index ef15b3414da5..d1bfce3e69ad 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q);
void blk_mq_free_queue(struct request_queue *q);
int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr);
void blk_mq_wake_waiters(struct request_queue *q);
-bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *, struct list_head *);
+bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *, struct list_head *, bool);
void blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list);
bool blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx);
bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctx,
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 50c6485cb04f..f8c4ba2682ec 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ struct blk_mq_queue_data {
typedef blk_status_t (queue_rq_fn)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *,
const struct blk_mq_queue_data *);
+typedef bool (get_budget_fn)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *);
+typedef void (put_budget_fn)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *);
typedef enum blk_eh_timer_return (timeout_fn)(struct request *, bool);
typedef int (init_hctx_fn)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *, void *, unsigned int);
typedef void (exit_hctx_fn)(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *, unsigned int);
@@ -112,6 +114,14 @@ struct blk_mq_ops {
queue_rq_fn *queue_rq;
/*
+ * Reserve budget before queue request, once .queue_rq is
+ * run, it is driver's responsibility to release the
+ * reserved budget.
+ */
+ get_budget_fn *get_budget;
+ put_budget_fn *put_budget;
+
+ /*
* Called on request timeout
*/
timeout_fn *timeout;
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 18:36 [PATCH V7 0/6] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:36 ` [PATCH V7 1/6] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 2/6] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 3/6] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-10-12 18:46 ` [PATCH V7 4/6] blk-mq: introduce .get_budget and .put_budget in blk_mq_ops Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 0:19 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:07 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:21 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 16:33 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:45 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 17:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 17:29 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 17:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-16 11:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-16 16:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-17 1:29 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-17 6:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-17 9:36 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-17 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 16:17 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:20 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:22 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 5/6] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 0:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 6/6] SCSI: implement .get_budget and .put_budget for blk-mq Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171012183704.22326-5-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).