From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"tom81094@gmail.com" <tom81094@gmail.com>,
"himanshu.madhani@cavium.com" <himanshu.madhani@cavium.com>,
"paolo.valente@linaro.org" <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"oleksandr@natalenko.name" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
"john.garry@huawei.com" <john.garry@huawei.com>,
"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>,
"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>,
"james.smart@broadcom.com" <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] blk-mq: introduce .get_budget and .put_budget in blk_mq_ops
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:29:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171017012922.GD15996@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515ca83f-5629-31e2-ef70-1869ae1b75ef@suse.de>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:30:09PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/13/2017 07:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 05:08:52PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 00:45 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 00:07 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>>> Actually it is in hot path, for example, lpfc and qla2xx's queue depth is 3,
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry but I doubt whether that is correct. More in general, I don't know any modern
> >>>> storage HBA for which the default queue depth is so low.
> >>>
> >>> You can grep:
> >>>
> >>> [ming@ming linux]$ git grep -n cmd_per_lun ./drivers/scsi/ | grep -E "qla2xxx|lpfc"
> >>
> >> Such a low queue depth will result in suboptimal performance for adapters
> >> that communicate over a storage network. I think that's a bug and that both
> >> adapters support much higher cmd_per_lun values.
> >>
> >> (+James Smart)
> >>
> >> James, can you explain us why commit 445cf4f4d2aa decreased LPFC_CMD_PER_LUN
> >> from 30 to 3? Was that perhaps a workaround for a bug in a specific target
> >> implementation?
> >>
> >> (+Himanshu Madhani)
> >>
> >> Himanshu, do you perhaps know whether it is safe to increase cmd_per_lun for
> >> the qla2xxx initiator driver to the scsi_host->can_queue value?
> >
> > ->can_queue is size of the whole tag space shared by all LUNs, looks it isn't
> > reasonable to increase cmd_per_lun to .can_queue.
> >
> '3' is just a starting point; later on it'll be adjusted via
> scsi_change_depth().
> Looks like it's not working correctly with blk-mq, though.
At default, in scsi_alloc_sdev(), q->queue_depth is set as
host->cmd_per_lun. You are right, q->queue_depth can be adjusted
later too.
q->queue_depth is respected in scsi_dev_queue_ready().
.cmd_per_lun defines the max outstanding cmds for each lun, I
guess it is respected by some hardware inside.
For example, I remembered that on lpfc q->queue_depth is 30 because
the default 'lpfc_lun_queue_depth' is 30. And its .cmd_per_lun is 3.
Per my observation, this .cmd_per_lun limit is still workable.
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 18:36 [PATCH V7 0/6] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:36 ` [PATCH V7 1/6] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 2/6] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 3/6] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 4/6] blk-mq: introduce .get_budget and .put_budget in blk_mq_ops Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 0:19 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:07 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:21 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 16:33 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:45 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 17:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 17:29 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 17:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-16 11:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-16 16:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-17 1:29 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-10-17 6:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-17 9:36 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-17 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 16:17 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:20 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 16:22 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 16:28 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 5/6] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-13 0:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-12 18:37 ` [PATCH V7 6/6] SCSI: implement .get_budget and .put_budget for blk-mq Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171017012922.GD15996@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=himanshu.madhani@cavium.com \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).