From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Two blk-mq related topics
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:27:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180130012755.GE17176@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180129204031.GA5499@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:40:31PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29 2018 at 10:46am -0500,
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > 2. When to enable SCSI_MQ at default again?
> >
> > SCSI_MQ is enabled on V3.17 firstly, but disabled at default. In V4.13-rc1,
> > it is enabled at default, but later the patch is reverted in V4.13-rc7, and
> > becomes disabled at default too.
> >
> > Now both the original reported PM issue(actually SCSI quiesce) and the
> > sequential IO performance issue have been addressed. And MQ IO schedulers
> > are ready too for traditional disks. Are there other issues to be addressed
> > for enabling SCSI_MQ at default? When can we do that again?
> >
> > Last time, the two issues were reported during V4.13 dev cycle just when it is
> > enabled at default, that seems if SCSI_MQ isn't enabled at default, it wouldn't
> > be exposed to run/tested completely & fully.
> >
> > So if we continue to disable it at default, maybe it can never be exposed to
> > full test/production environment.
>
> I was going to propose revisiting this as well.
>
> I'd really like to see all the old .request_fn block core code removed.
Yeah, that should be a final goal, but may take a bit long.
>
> But maybe we take a first step of enabling:
> CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=Y
> CONFIG_DM_MQ_DEFAULT=Y
Maybe you can remove legacy path from DM_RQ first, and take your
original approach to allow DM/MQ over legacy underlying driver,
seems we discussed this topic before, :-)
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-29 15:46 [LSF/MM TOPIC] Two blk-mq related topics Ming Lei
2018-01-29 20:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-30 1:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-01-29 20:56 ` James Bottomley
2018-01-29 21:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-29 23:46 ` James Bottomley
2018-01-30 1:47 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-30 10:08 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-01-30 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 1:24 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-30 8:33 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-01-30 10:33 ` John Garry
2018-02-07 10:55 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180130012755.GE17176@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox