public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jaegeuk@kernel.org" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Nijnikov <Stanislav.Nijnikov@wdc.com>,
	Alex Lemberg <Alex.Lemberg@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] ufs: sysfs: device descriptor
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 08:17:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180202071735.GC9314@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1517531145.2746.26.camel@wdc.com>

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:25:46AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 18:15 +0200, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote:
> > +enum ufs_desc_param_size {
> > +	UFS_PARAM_BYTE_SIZE	= 1,
> > +	UFS_PARAM_WORD_SIZE	= 2,
> > +	UFS_PARAM_DWORD_SIZE	= 4,
> > +	UFS_PARAM_QWORD_SIZE	= 8,
> > +};
> 
> Please do not copy bad naming choices from the Windows kernel into the Linux
> kernel. Using names like WORD / DWORD / QWORD is much less readable than using
> the numeric constants 2, 4, 8. Hence my proposal to leave out the above enum
> completely.

Are you sure those do not come from the spec itself?  It's been a while
since I last read it, but for some reason I remember those types of
names being in there.  But I might be confusing specs here.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-02  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 16:15 [PATCH v4 00/10] ufs: sysfs: read-only access to device descriptors, attributes and flags Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] ufs: sysfs: attribute group for existing sysfs entries Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 16:59   ` Greg KH
2018-02-04 12:29     ` Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-04 12:33       ` Greg KH
2018-02-04 13:09         ` Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-04 13:15           ` Greg KH
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] ufs: sysfs: device descriptor Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 17:00   ` Greg KH
2018-02-02  0:25   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-02  7:17     ` gregkh [this message]
2018-02-02 16:32       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-04  9:03         ` Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-04 10:44           ` gregkh
2018-02-02  0:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] ufs: sysfs: interconnect descriptor Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 17:01   ` Greg KH
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] ufs: sysfs: geometry descriptor Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] ufs: sysfs: health descriptor Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] ufs: sysfs: power descriptor Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] ufs: sysfs: string descriptors Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] ufs: sysfs: unit descriptor Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-02  0:38   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] ufs: sysfs: flags Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 16:15 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] ufs: sysfs: attributes Stanislav Nijnikov
2018-02-01 17:03   ` Greg KH
2018-02-01 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] ufs: sysfs: read-only access to device descriptors, attributes and flags Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180202071735.GC9314@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Alex.Lemberg@wdc.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=Stanislav.Nijnikov@wdc.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox