From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Vinayak Kale <vinayak.kale@seagate.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] libata: don't try to pass through NCQ commands to non-NCQ devices
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 20:33:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180204043351.16812-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94eb2c1fae0400ce57055cd4e9bb@google.com>
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
syzkaller hit a WARN() in ata_bmdma_qc_issue() when writing to /dev/sg0.
This happened because it issued an ATA pass-through command (ATA_16)
where the protocol field indicated that NCQ should be used -- but the
device did not support NCQ.
We could just remove the WARN() from libata-sff.c, but the real problem
seems to be that the SCSI -> ATA translation code passes through NCQ
commands without verifying that the device actually supports NCQ.
Fix this by adding the appropriate check to ata_scsi_pass_thru().
Here's reproducer that works in QEMU when /dev/sg0 refers to a disk of
the default type ("82371SB PIIX3 IDE"):
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main()
{
char buf[53] = { 0 };
buf[36] = 0x85; /* ATA_16 */
buf[37] = (12 << 1); /* FPDMA */
buf[38] = 0x1; /* Has data */
buf[51] = 0xC8; /* ATA_CMD_READ */
write(open("/dev/sg0", O_RDWR), buf, sizeof(buf));
}
Fixes: ee7fb331c3ac ("libata: add support for NCQ commands for SG interface")
Reported-by: syzbot+2f69ca28df61bdfc77cd36af2e789850355a221e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 47d421666451c..197e110f8ac75 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -3316,6 +3316,12 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_pass_thru(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
goto invalid_fld;
}
+ /* We may not issue NCQ commands to devices not supporting NCQ */
+ if (ata_is_ncq(tf->protocol) && !ata_ncq_enabled(dev)) {
+ fp = 1;
+ goto invalid_fld;
+ }
+
/* sanity check for pio multi commands */
if ((cdb[1] & 0xe0) && !is_multi_taskfile(tf)) {
fp = 1;
--
2.16.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-04 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <94eb2c1fae0400ce57055cd4e9bb@google.com>
2018-02-04 4:33 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2018-02-12 17:21 ` [PATCH] libata: don't try to pass through NCQ commands to non-NCQ devices Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180204043351.16812-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vinayak.kale@seagate.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox