linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 4.18-rc3
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 23:45:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711064542.GA7377@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70d566f0-2dda-60c2-7c7a-e09e371f8607@cybernetics.com>

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:53:18PM -0400, Tony Battersby wrote:
> At my job (https://www.cybernetics.com/), I use the write()/read()
> interface to the SCSI generic driver for access to tape drives and tape
> medium changers.  For example, the write()/read() interface is useful
> for implementing RAID-like functionality for tape drives since a single
> thread can send commands to multiple tape drives at once and poll() for
> command completion.  We have a lot of code invested in this interface,
> so it would be a huge pain for us if it were removed.  But in our case,
> everything runs as root (as the firmware of an embedded storage
> appliance), so extra permission checks should be OK.

Do you just use read/write on /dev/sg or also on /dev/bsg?  Because
I started a discussion to kill the read/write support for the latter
even before Linus brought it up here..  (and we have the same fix
pending for /dev/bsg)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-06 21:38 [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 4.18-rc3 James Bottomley
2018-07-07  2:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-07  2:39   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-07  2:48     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-07  5:22       ` James Bottomley
2018-07-10  0:41         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-10 17:36           ` Jann Horn
2018-07-10 17:49             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-10 18:04               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-10 21:53           ` Tony Battersby
2018-07-10 22:24             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-11  0:40               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-11  6:45             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-07-11 13:56               ` Tony Battersby
2018-07-16 16:20           ` Jann Horn
2018-07-07  3:08     ` Jann Horn
2018-07-07  3:25       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180711064542.GA7377@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).