From: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>,
Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>,
Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@cisco.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/16] scsi: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:38:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181003053902.6910-10-ldr709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181003053902.6910-1-ldr709@gmail.com>
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
Cc: Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>
Cc: Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@cisco.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/snic/snic_scsi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_scsi.c
index d9b2e46424aa..42e485139fc9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_scsi.c
@@ -2001,7 +2001,7 @@ snic_dr_finish(struct snic *snic, struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
}
dr_failed:
- SNIC_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(io_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(io_lock);
if (rqi)
CMD_SP(sc) = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(io_lock, flags);
@@ -2604,7 +2604,7 @@ snic_internal_abort_io(struct snic *snic, struct scsi_cmnd *sc, int tmf)
ret = SUCCESS;
skip_internal_abts:
- SNIC_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(io_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(io_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(io_lock, flags);
return ret;
--
2.19.0
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-03 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20181003053902.6910-1-ldr709@gmail.com>
2018-10-03 5:38 ` Lance Roy [this message]
2018-10-03 13:53 ` [PATCH 09/16] scsi: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep Bart Van Assche
2018-10-11 2:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181003053902.6910-10-ldr709@gmail.com \
--to=ldr709@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kartilak@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sebaddel@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox