From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] pcmcia: allow PCMCIA support independent of the architecture Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 07:42:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20181014054252.GA24103@light.dominikbrodowski.net> References: <20181013151016.31674-1-hch@lst.de> <20181013151016.31674-6-hch@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181013151016.31674-6-hch@lst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Matt Porter , Alexandre Bounine , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There is nothing architecture specific in the PCMCIA core, so allow > building it everywhere. The actual host controllers will depend on ISA, > PCI or a specific SOC. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good to me, though I'm interested on any subtle (build) breakage when this gets exposure in -next. Will you push this patch upstream directly, or should it go in via the pcmcia tree? If it is the former, feel free to add Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski Thanks, Dominik