From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 22:52:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20181015055201.GA21295@infradead.org> References: <91b9ff9fc19ba40e3a2562171c8cd78a2ce7dc79.1539497520.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au> <20181014154753.GA19252@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Finn Thain Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Michael Schmitz , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:13:37AM +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > + *p++ = IDENTIFY(lp && (tp->flags & ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT), lun); > > > > I think lp should always be non-NULL here. > > > > It's not clear from Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt, but I guess > that's true for scanning of targets. > > Is it true in general that queuecommand for a device will not occur before > its slave_alloc and not after its slave_destroy invocation? Yes.