From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Busch Subject: Re: Question on handling managed IRQs when hotplugging CPUs Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 07:52:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20190205145244.GB28023@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190129154433.GF15302@localhost.localdomain> <757902fc-a9ea-090b-7853-89944a0ce1b5@huawei.com> <20190129172059.GC17132@localhost.localdomain> <3fe63dab-0791-f476-69c4-9866b70e8520@huawei.com> <86d5028d-44ab-3696-f7fe-828d7655faa9@huawei.com> <745609be-b215-dd2d-c31f-0bd84572f49f@suse.de> <42d149c5-0380-c357-8811-81015159ac04@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42d149c5-0380-c357-8811-81015159ac04@huawei.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: John Garry Cc: Hannes Reinecke , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig , Marc Zyngier , "axboe@kernel.dk" , Peter Zijlstra , Michael Ellerman , Linuxarm , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hannes Reinecke , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 05:24:11AM -0800, John Garry wrote: > On 04/02/2019 07:12, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > Hi Hannes, > > > > > So, as the user then has to wait for the system to declars 'ready for > > CPU remove', why can't we just disable the SQ and wait for all I/O to > > complete? > > We can make it more fine-grained by just waiting on all outstanding I/O > > on that SQ to complete, but waiting for all I/O should be good as an > > initial try. > > With that we wouldn't need to fiddle with driver internals, and could > > make it pretty generic. > > I don't fully understand this idea - specifically, at which layer would > we be waiting for all the IO to complete? Whichever layer dispatched the IO to a CPU specific context should be the one to wait for its completion. That should be blk-mq for most block drivers.