From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: fix calls to dma_set_mask_and_coherent() Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:06:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20190212080627.GC10547@infradead.org> References: <20190211150502.9999-1-emilne@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190211150502.9999-1-emilne@redhat.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Ewan D. Milne" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, james.smart@broadcom.com, dick.kennedy@broadcom.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:05:02AM -0500, Ewan D. Milne wrote: > The change to use dma_set_mask_and_coherent() incorrectly made a second > call with the 32 bit DMA mask value when the call with the 64 bit DMA > mask value succeeded. This resulted in NVMe/FC connections failing due > to corrupted data buffers, and various other SCSI/FCP I/O errors. Ooops, sorry. > /* Set the device DMA mask size */ > - if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) || > - dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) > - return error; > + if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) != 0) > + if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) != 0) But this still looks obsfuctating, why not: error = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); if (error) error = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))); if (error) return error;