From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] scsi: implement .cleanup_rq callback
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:03:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190723010345.GB30776@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eed624d5-0585-699c-9084-9f5f0ea09e52@acm.org>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 08:40:23AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/19/19 8:06 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index e1da8c70a266..52537c145762 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -154,12 +154,9 @@ scsi_set_blocked(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, int reason)
> > static void scsi_mq_requeue_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> > {
> > - if (cmd->request->rq_flags & RQF_DONTPREP) {
> > - cmd->request->rq_flags &= ~RQF_DONTPREP;
> > - scsi_mq_uninit_cmd(cmd);
> > - } else {
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
> > - }
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(cmd->request->rq_flags & RQF_DONTPREP));
> > +
> > + scsi_mq_uninit_cmd(cmd);
> > blk_mq_requeue_request(cmd->request, true);
> > }
>
> The above changes are independent of this patch series. Have you considered
> to move these into a separate patch?
OK.
>
> > +/*
> > + * Only called when the request isn't completed by SCSI, and not freed by
> > + * SCSI
> > + */
> > +static void scsi_cleanup_rq(struct request *rq)
> > +{
> > + struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> > +
> > + scsi_mq_uninit_cmd(cmd);
> > +}
>
> Is the comment above this function correct? The previous patch adds an
> unconditional call to mq_ops->cleanup_rq() in blk_mq_free_request().
You are right, will fix it in V3.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-23 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-20 3:06 [PATCH V2 0/2] block/scsi/dm-rq: fix leak of request private data in dm-mpath Ming Lei
2019-07-20 3:06 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] blk-mq: add callback of .cleanup_rq Ming Lei
2019-07-22 16:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-07-23 1:00 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-20 3:06 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] scsi: implement .cleanup_rq callback Ming Lei
2019-07-22 15:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-07-23 1:03 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-07-25 10:46 ` [scsi] ae86a1c553: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address kernel test robot
2019-07-27 2:15 ` Ming Lei
2019-07-26 16:20 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] block/scsi/dm-rq: fix leak of request private data in dm-mpath Benjamin Block
2019-07-27 2:12 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190723010345.GB30776@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox