From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53D9C433DF for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16AD223E0 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:46:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592761571; bh=ALAY1kL3HOvixItCdKVfg4OQ+QcGUrLix48exQRbR2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=gY9Qslb/04ggUF2IgG8Dc7C+VQ4e6CDjZFLNbdayYIFMtwn4nGL/9opbnustA1/IO 658KneAe+OHgKFcPCqQpmywcCzWGhdpr2YLKtnS3d0iWIRg64s3Dr+OXeDMUKOijNt hW2t/rq0Xsj9tOHEMUrk7NfQY//Dew63kuTQjnGY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730494AbgFURqL (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:46:11 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54662 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730485AbgFURqL (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:46:11 -0400 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-107-3-166-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [107.3.166.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56F30221E7; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:46:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592761570; bh=ALAY1kL3HOvixItCdKVfg4OQ+QcGUrLix48exQRbR2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VFno9ZKxesX0cScIyDxV5cP/GmuIgeRrdZExcaUmv2GpkE8OQIzUhhz8foOF+hlSd rqTVZhAaXLrUBp+E3KsmcqwgHTCYIFY+BjlvCJlBJNqKkkLk/XrktaIZfHrIxc0Ygc LUah7xpfs+11ZXXCpH/oRMGFo5g+D6bTHKRWJsAY= Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:46:08 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Avri Altman Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Satya Tangirala , "alim.akhtar@samsung.com" , "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , Barani Muthukumaran , Kuohong Wang , Kim Boojin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Inline Encryption support for UFS Message-ID: <20200621174608.GA1140@sol.localdomain> References: <20200618024736.97207-1-satyat@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 12:47:11PM +0000, Avri Altman wrote: > > > +Alim & Asutosh > > > > Hi Satya, > > > > > > > > Avri, > > > > > > > This patch series adds support for inline encryption to UFS using > > > > the inline encryption support in the block layer. It follows the JEDEC > > > > UFSHCI v2.1 specification, which defines inline encryption for UFS. > > > > > > I'd appreciate it if you could review this series. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering > > A quick question and a comment: > > > > Does the IE infrastructure that you've added to the block layer invented for > > ufs? > And how this infrastructure relates to Eric's RFC: Inline crypto support on DragonBoard 845c > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg141472.html > My patches are based on top of Satya's patches. My patches just introduce the quirks needed for Qualcomm ICE to work, since it doesn't follow the UFS standard exactly. - Eric