public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>,
	Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] lpfc: Fix lun loss after cable pull
Date: Mon,  3 Aug 2020 14:02:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200803210229.23063-8-jsmart2021@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200803210229.23063-1-jsmart2021@gmail.com>

On devices that support FCP sequence error recovery, which attempts to
preserve the devices login across link bounce, adisc is used for device
validation. Turns out the device fc4 type is cleared as part of the link
bounce, but the ADISC handling doesn't restore the FC4 support as it
normally would with a PRLI. This caused situations where the device wasn't
reregistered with the transport thus scan logic and lun discovery never
kicked in.

In the ADISC completion handling, reset the fc4 type so that transport
port reregistration occurs with the remote port.

Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c
index e4c710fe0245..cad53d19cb25 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c
@@ -1745,7 +1745,13 @@ lpfc_cmpl_adisc_adisc_issue(struct lpfc_vport *vport,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (ndlp->nlp_type & NLP_FCP_TARGET) {
+	if (ndlp->nlp_type & NLP_FCP_TARGET)
+		ndlp->nlp_fc4_type |= NLP_FC4_FCP;
+
+	if (ndlp->nlp_type & NLP_NVME_TARGET)
+		ndlp->nlp_fc4_type |= NLP_FC4_NVME;
+
+	if (ndlp->nlp_type & (NLP_FCP_TARGET | NLP_NVME_TARGET)) {
 		ndlp->nlp_prev_state = NLP_STE_ADISC_ISSUE;
 		lpfc_nlp_set_state(vport, ndlp, NLP_STE_MAPPED_NODE);
 	} else {
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-03 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-03 21:02 [PATCH 0/8] lpfc: Update lpfc to revision 12.8.0.3 James Smart
2020-08-03 21:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] lpfc: Fix FCoE speed reporting James Smart
2020-08-03 21:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] lpfc: Fix no message shown for lpfc_hdw_queue out of range value James Smart
2020-08-03 21:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] lpfc: Fix RSCN timeout due to incorrect gidft counter James Smart
2020-08-03 21:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] lpfc: Fix oops when unloading driver while running mds diags James Smart
2020-08-03 21:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] lpfc: Fix retry of PRLI when status indicates its unsupported James Smart
2020-08-03 21:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] lpfc: Fix validation of bsg reply lengths James Smart
2020-08-03 21:02 ` James Smart [this message]
2020-08-03 21:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] lpfc: Update lpfc version to 12.8.0.3 James Smart
2020-08-05  1:17 ` [PATCH 0/8] lpfc: Update lpfc to revision 12.8.0.3 Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200803210229.23063-8-jsmart2021@gmail.com \
    --to=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
    --cc=dick.kennedy@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox