From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 18:22:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200906012219.17893-10-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200906012219.17893-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
blk_queue_enter() accepts BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT independent of the runtime
power management state. Since SCSI domain validation no longer depends on
this behavior, modify the behavior of blk_queue_enter() as follows:
- Do not accept any requests while suspended.
- Only process power management requests while suspending or resuming.
Submitting BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT requests to a device that is runtime-
suspended causes runtime-suspended block devices not to resume as they
should. The request which should cause a runtime resume instead gets
issued directly, without resuming the device first. Of course the device
can't handle it properly, the I/O fails, and the device remains suspended.
The problem is fixed by checking that the queue's runtime-PM status
isn't RPM_SUSPENDED before allowing a request to be issued, and
queuing a runtime-resume request if it is. In particular, the inline
blk_pm_request_resume() routine is renamed blk_pm_resume_queue() and
the code is unified by merging the surrounding checks into the
routine. If the queue isn't set up for runtime PM, or there currently
is no restriction on allowed requests, the request is allowed.
Likewise if the BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT flag is set and the status isn't
RPM_SUSPENDED. Otherwise a runtime resume is queued and the request
is blocked until conditions are more suitable.
Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
[ bvanassche: modified commit message and removed Cc: stable because without
the previous patches from this series this patch would break parallel SCSI
domain validation ]
---
block/blk-core.c | 6 +++---
block/blk-pm.h | 14 +++++++++-----
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index c5a2f8173b1f..22c1c6e6c0e1 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -436,7 +436,8 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags)
* responsible for ensuring that that counter is
* globally visible before the queue is unfrozen.
*/
- if (pm || !blk_queue_pm_only(q)) {
+ if ((pm && q->rpm_status != RPM_SUSPENDED) ||
+ !blk_queue_pm_only(q)) {
success = true;
} else {
percpu_ref_put(&q->q_usage_counter);
@@ -461,8 +462,7 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags)
wait_event(q->mq_freeze_wq,
(!q->mq_freeze_depth &&
- (pm || (blk_pm_request_resume(q),
- !blk_queue_pm_only(q)))) ||
+ blk_pm_resume_queue(pm, q)) ||
blk_queue_dying(q));
if (blk_queue_dying(q))
return -ENODEV;
diff --git a/block/blk-pm.h b/block/blk-pm.h
index ea5507d23e75..a2283cc9f716 100644
--- a/block/blk-pm.h
+++ b/block/blk-pm.h
@@ -6,11 +6,14 @@
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
-static inline void blk_pm_request_resume(struct request_queue *q)
+static inline int blk_pm_resume_queue(const bool pm, struct request_queue *q)
{
- if (q->dev && (q->rpm_status == RPM_SUSPENDED ||
- q->rpm_status == RPM_SUSPENDING))
- pm_request_resume(q->dev);
+ if (!q->dev || !blk_queue_pm_only(q))
+ return 1; /* Nothing to do */
+ if (pm && q->rpm_status != RPM_SUSPENDED)
+ return 1; /* Request allowed */
+ pm_request_resume(q->dev);
+ return 0;
}
static inline void blk_pm_mark_last_busy(struct request *rq)
@@ -44,8 +47,9 @@ static inline void blk_pm_put_request(struct request *rq)
--rq->q->nr_pending;
}
#else
-static inline void blk_pm_request_resume(struct request_queue *q)
+static inline int blk_pm_resume_queue(const bool pm, struct request_queue *q)
{
+ return 1;
}
static inline void blk_pm_mark_last_busy(struct request *rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-06 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-06 1:22 [PATCH 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SCSI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/9] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 3/9] scsi: Pass a request queue pointer to __scsi_execute() Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 4/9] scsi: Rework scsi_mq_alloc_queue() Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 5/9] scsi: Do not wait for a request in scsi_eh_lock_door() Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 16:03 ` Alan Stern
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 6/9] scsi_transport_spi: Make spi_execute() accept a request queue pointer Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 7/9] scsi_transport_spi: Freeze request queues instead of quiescing Bart Van Assche
2020-09-09 3:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` [PATCH 8/9] block, scsi, ide: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Bart Van Assche
2020-09-06 1:22 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-09-06 16:06 ` [PATCH 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SCSI domain validation Alan Stern
2020-09-19 3:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-09-21 6:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-09-30 2:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-09-29 12:33 ` Martin Kepplinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200906012219.17893-10-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox