From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: "chenxiang (M)" <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>, Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] Hang on sync after dd
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:26:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202072619.GA511454@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cb5cd8e-5a48-dc36-879c-37950e6228c8@hisilicon.com>
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:22:10PM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote:
>
>
> 在 2020/12/2 11:22, Ming Lei 写道:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:44:48AM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote:
> > >
> > > 在 2020/12/1 20:34, Ming Lei 写道:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:22:33AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Some guys internally upgraded to v5.10-rcX and start to see a hang after dd
> > > > > + sync for a large file:
> > > > > - mount /dev/sda1 (ext4 filesystem) to directory /mnt;
> > > > > - run "if=/dev/zero of=test1 bs=1M count=2000" on directory /mnt;
> > > > > - run "sync"
> > > > >
> > > > > and get:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 367.912761] INFO: task jbd2/sdb1-8:3602 blocked for more than 120
> > > > > seconds.
> > > > > [ 367.919618] Not tainted 5.10.0-rc1-109488-g32ded76956b6 #948
> > > > > [ 367.925776] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
> > > > > disables this message.
> > > > > [ 367.933579] task:jbd2/sdb1-8 state:D stack: 0 pid: 3602
> > > > > ppid: 2 flags:0x00000028
> > > > > [ 367.941901] Call trace:
> > > > > [ 367.944351] __switch_to+0xb8/0x168
> > > > > [ 367.947840] __schedule+0x30c/0x670
> > > > > [ 367.951326] schedule+0x70/0x108
> > > > > [ 367.954550] io_schedule+0x1c/0xe8
> > > > > [ 367.957948] bit_wait_io+0x18/0x68
> > > > > [ 367.961346] __wait_on_bit+0x78/0xf0
> > > > > [ 367.964919] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x8c/0xb0
> > > > > [ 367.969356] __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x40
> > > > > [ 367.973188] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x1370/0x1958
> > > > > [ 367.978661] kjournald2+0xcc/0x260
> > > > > [ 367.982061] kthread+0x150/0x158
> > > > > [ 367.985288] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34
> > > > > [ 367.988860] INFO: task sync:3823 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > > > > [ 367.995102] Not tainted 5.10.0-rc1-109488-g32ded76956b6 #948
> > > > > [ 368.001265] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
> > > > > disables this message.
> > > > > [ 368.009067] task:sync state:D stack: 0 pid: 3823 ppid:
> > > > > 3450 flags:0x00000009
> > > > > [ 368.017397] Call trace:
> > > > > [ 368.019841] __switch_to+0xb8/0x168
> > > > > [ 368.023320] __schedule+0x30c/0x670
> > > > > [ 368.026804] schedule+0x70/0x108
> > > > > [ 368.030025] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0xbc/0x158
> > > > > [ 368.034290] ext4_sync_fs+0x188/0x1c8
> > > > > [ 368.037947] sync_fs_one_sb+0x30/0x40
> > > > > [ 368.041606] iterate_supers+0x9c/0x138
> > > > > [ 368.045350] ksys_sync+0x64/0xc0
> > > > > [ 368.048569] __arm64_sys_sync+0x10/0x20
> > > > > [ 368.052398] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0x68/0x170
> > > > > [ 368.057177] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90
> > > > > [ 368.060482] el0_sync_handler+0x118/0x168
> > > > > [ 368.064478] el0_sync+0x158/0x180
> > > > >
> > > > > The issue was reported here originally:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/4d18326e-9ca2-d0cb-7cb8-cb56981280da@hisilicon.com/
> > > > >
> > > > > But it looks like issue related to recent work for SCSI MQ.
> > > > >
> > > > > They can only create with hisi_sas v3 hw. I could not create with megaraid
> > > > > sas on the same dev platform or hisi_sas on a similar dev board.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reverting "scsi: core: Only re-run queue in scsi_end_request() if device
> > > > > queue is busy" seems solve the issue. Also, checking out to patch prior to
> > > > > "scsi: hisi_sas: Switch v3 hw to MQ" seems to not have the issue.
> > > > If the issue can be reproduced, you may try the following patch:
> > > I tried the change, and the issue is still.
> > > We find that the number of completed IO is less than dispatched, but from
> > > sysfs of block device (such as /sys/devices/pci0000:74/0000:74:02.0/host0/port-0:0/end_device-0:0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/sda1/inflight),
> > >
> > > the number of inflight is 0.
> > Hello chenxiang,
> >
> > Can you collect the debugfs log via the following commands after the io
> > hang is triggered?
> >
> > 1) debugfs log:
> >
> > (cd /sys/kernel/debug/block/sda && find . -type f -exec grep -aH . {} \;)
> >
> > 2) scsi sysfs info:
> >
> > (cd /sys/block/sda/device && find . -type f -exec grep -aH . {} \;)
> >
> > Suppose the disk is /dev/sda.
>
> The issue occurs on /dev/sdb1, and those logs are as follows (please notice
> that i add the change you provide):
Hello chenxiang,
Please try the following patch:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 60c7a7d74852..03c6d0620bfd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1703,8 +1703,7 @@ static blk_status_t scsi_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
break;
case BLK_STS_RESOURCE:
case BLK_STS_ZONE_RESOURCE:
- if (atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) ||
- scsi_device_blocked(sdev))
+ if (scsi_device_blocked(sdev))
ret = BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE;
break;
default:
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 11:22 [bug report] Hang on sync after dd John Garry
2020-12-01 10:26 ` Kashyap Desai
2020-12-01 11:48 ` John Garry
2020-12-01 12:34 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-02 1:44 ` chenxiang (M)
2020-12-02 3:22 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-02 6:22 ` chenxiang (M)
2020-12-02 7:26 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-12-02 9:06 ` chenxiang (M)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201202072619.GA511454@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox