[PATCH v3 06/18] ibmvfc: add handlers to drain and complete Sub-CRQ responses

Tyrel Datwyler
2020-12-03T02:10:14Z

The logic for iterating over the Sub-CRQ responses is similiar to that
of the primary CRQ. Add the necessary handlers for processing those
responses.

Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
index e082935f56cf..b61ae1df21e5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
@@ -3381,6 +3381,86 @@ static int ibmvfc_toggle_scrq_irq(struct ibmvfc_sub_queue *scrq, int enable)
return rc;
}

+static void ibmvfc_handle_scrq(struct ibmvfc_crq *crq, struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
+{
+ struct ibmvfc_event *evt = (struct ibmvfc_event *)be64_to_cpu(crq->ioba);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ switch (crq->valid) {
+ case IBMVFC_CRQ_CMD_RSP:
+ break;
+ case IBMVFC_CRQ_XPORT_EVENT:
+ return;
+ default:
+ dev_err(vhost->dev, "Got and invalid message type 0x%02x\n", crq->valid);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* The only kind of payload CRQs we should get are responses to
+ * things we send. Make sure this response is to something we
+ * actually sent
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!ibmvfc_valid_event(&vhost->pool, evt))) {
+ dev_err(vhost->dev, "Returned correlation_token 0x%08llx is invalid!\n",
+ crq->ioba);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&evt->free))) {
+ dev_err(vhost->dev, "Received duplicate correlation_token 0x%08llx!\n",
+ crq->ioba);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ del_timer(&evt->timer);
+ list_del(&evt->queue);
+ ibmvfc_trc_end(evt);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+ evt->done(evt);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static struct ibmvfc_crq *ibmvfc_next_scrq(struct ibmvfc_sub_queue *scrq)
+{
+ struct ibmvfc_crq *crq;
+
+ crq = &scrq->msgs[scrq->cur].crq;
+ if (crq->valid & 0x80) {
+ if (++scrq->cur == scrq->size)
+ scrq->cur = 0;
+ rmb();
+ } else
+ crq = NULL;
+
+ return crq;
+}
+
+static void ibmvfc_drain_sub_crq(struct ibmvfc_sub_queue *scrq)
+{
+ struct ibmvfc_crq *crq;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int done = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(scrq->vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+ while (!done) {
+ while ((crq = ibmvfc_next_scrq(scrq)) != NULL) {
+ ibmvfc_handle_scrq(crq, scrq->vhost);
+ crq->valid = 0;
+ wmb();
+ }
+
+ ibmvfc_toggle_scrq_irq(scrq, 1);
+ if ((crq = ibmvfc_next_scrq(scrq)) != NULL) {
+ ibmvfc_toggle_scrq_irq(scrq, 0);
+ ibmvfc_handle_scrq(crq, scrq->vhost);
+ crq->valid = 0;
+ wmb();
+ } else
+ done = 1;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(scrq->vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
+}
+
/**
* ibmvfc_init_tgt - Set the next init job step for the target
* @tgt: ibmvfc target struct
--
2.27.0