From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:29:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209052951.16136-2-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209052951.16136-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
With the current implementation the following race can happen:
* blk_pre_runtime_suspend() calls blk_freeze_queue_start() and
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue().
* blk_queue_enter() calls blk_queue_pm_only() and that function returns
true.
* blk_queue_enter() calls blk_pm_request_resume() and that function does
not call pm_request_resume() because the queue runtime status is
RPM_ACTIVE.
* blk_pre_runtime_suspend() changes the queue status into RPM_SUSPENDING.
Fix this race by changing the queue runtime status into RPM_SUSPENDING
before switching q_usage_counter to atomic mode.
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 986d413b7c15 ("blk-mq: Enable support for runtime power management")
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
block/blk-pm.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-pm.c b/block/blk-pm.c
index b85234d758f7..17bd020268d4 100644
--- a/block/blk-pm.c
+++ b/block/blk-pm.c
@@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ int blk_pre_runtime_suspend(struct request_queue *q)
WARN_ON_ONCE(q->rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE);
+ spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+ q->rpm_status = RPM_SUSPENDING;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+
/*
* Increase the pm_only counter before checking whether any
* non-PM blk_queue_enter() calls are in progress to avoid that any
@@ -89,15 +93,14 @@ int blk_pre_runtime_suspend(struct request_queue *q)
/* Switch q_usage_counter back to per-cpu mode. */
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
- spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+ q->rpm_status = RPM_ACTIVE;
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(q->dev);
- else
- q->rpm_status = RPM_SUSPENDING;
- spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
- if (ret)
blk_clear_pm_only(q);
+ }
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 5:29 [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:06 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:06 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:05 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:04 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 7:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201209052951.16136-2-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).