From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/21] ufs: Remove ufshcd_valid_tag()
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:12:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210701211224.17070-11-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210701211224.17070-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
scsi_add_host() allocates shost->can_queue tags. ufshcd_init() sets
shost->can_queue to hba->nutrs. In other words, we know that tag values
will be in the range [0, hba->nutrs). Hence remove the checks that
verify that blk_get_request() returns a tag in this range. This check
was introduced by commit 14497328b6a6 ("scsi: ufs: verify command tag
validity").
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 40 ++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 2148e123e9db..2e6aa614e3f5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -253,11 +253,6 @@ static inline void ufshcd_wb_toggle_flush(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool enable);
static void ufshcd_hba_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba);
static void ufshcd_hba_vreg_set_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba);
-static inline bool ufshcd_valid_tag(struct ufs_hba *hba, int tag)
-{
- return tag >= 0 && tag < hba->nutrs;
-}
-
static inline void ufshcd_enable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
if (!hba->is_irq_enabled) {
@@ -2701,21 +2696,11 @@ static void ufshcd_init_lrb(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrb, int i)
*/
static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
{
+ struct ufs_hba *hba = shost_priv(host);
+ int tag = cmd->request->tag;
struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
- struct ufs_hba *hba;
- int tag;
int err = 0;
- hba = shost_priv(host);
-
- tag = cmd->request->tag;
- if (!ufshcd_valid_tag(hba, tag)) {
- dev_err(hba->dev,
- "%s: invalid command tag %d: cmd=0x%p, cmd->request=0x%p",
- __func__, tag, cmd, cmd->request);
- BUG();
- }
-
if (!down_read_trylock(&hba->clk_scaling_lock))
return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
@@ -2968,7 +2953,6 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
goto out_unlock;
}
tag = req->tag;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!ufshcd_valid_tag(hba, tag));
if (unlikely(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) {
err = -EBUSY;
@@ -6673,7 +6657,6 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
goto out_unlock;
}
tag = req->tag;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!ufshcd_valid_tag(hba, tag));
if (unlikely(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) {
err = -EBUSY;
@@ -6975,25 +6958,14 @@ static int ufshcd_try_to_abort_task(struct ufs_hba *hba, int tag)
*/
static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
{
- struct Scsi_Host *host;
- struct ufs_hba *hba;
+ struct Scsi_Host *host = cmd->device->host;
+ struct ufs_hba *hba = shost_priv(host);
+ unsigned int tag = cmd->request->tag;
+ struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned int tag;
int err = 0;
- struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
u32 reg;
- host = cmd->device->host;
- hba = shost_priv(host);
- tag = cmd->request->tag;
- lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
- if (!ufshcd_valid_tag(hba, tag)) {
- dev_err(hba->dev,
- "%s: invalid command tag %d: cmd=0x%p, cmd->request=0x%p",
- __func__, tag, cmd, cmd->request);
- BUG();
- }
-
ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
reg = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
/* If command is already aborted/completed, return SUCCESS */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-01 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-01 21:12 [PATCH 00/21] UFS patches for kernel v5.15 Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 01/21] Fix the documentation of the scsi_execute() time parameter Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 5:51 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 02/21] libsas: Only abort commands from inside the error handler Bart Van Assche
2021-07-03 2:32 ` Jason Yan
2021-07-04 23:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 7:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 03/21] Clear host_eh_scheduled from inside the SCSI " Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 04/21] libsas: Stop clearing host_eh_scheduled from the " Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 05/21] ata: Stop clearing host_eh_scheduled from error handlers Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 06/21] ufs: Reduce power management code duplication Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 6:18 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 07/21] ufs: Only include power management code if necessary Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 6:33 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-07 20:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-08 5:50 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 08/21] ufs: Rename the second ufshcd_probe_hba() argument Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 09/21] ufs: Use DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK() where appropriate Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 6:38 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-01 21:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-07-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 10/21] ufs: Remove ufshcd_valid_tag() Avri Altman
2021-07-05 18:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 19:01 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-05 19:02 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 11/21] ufs: Verify UIC locking requirements at runtime Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 6:52 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 12/21] ufs: Improve static type checking for the host controller state Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 13/21] ufs: Remove several wmb() calls Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 22:26 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-07-01 22:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 14/21] ufs: Inline ufshcd_outstanding_req_clear() Bart Van Assche
2021-07-05 7:03 ` Avri Altman
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 15/21] ufs: Rename __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 16/21] ufs: Fix the SCSI abort handler Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 17/21] ufs: Fix a race in the completion path Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 18/21] ufs: Use the doorbell register instead of the UTRLCNR register Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 19/21] ufs: Request sense data asynchronously Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 20/21] ufs: Synchronize SCSI and UFS error handling Bart Van Assche
2021-07-01 21:12 ` [PATCH 21/21] ufs: Retry aborted SCSI commands instead of completing these successfully Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210701211224.17070-11-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).