From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 4/6] scsi: ufs: Fix a possible dead lock in clock scaling
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 15:06:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211004120650.153218-5-adrian.hunter@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211004120650.153218-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Instead of downgrade_write(), extend the ufshcd_down_write() to cover
ufshcd_wb_toggle() because ufshcd_down_write() now supports nesting
ufshcd_down_read() but down_read() nested within down_read() can deadlock.
Reported-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbc4d03a07f03fe4fbe697813111471f@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 12 +++---------
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 ------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 3912b74d50ae..64ac9e48c4d7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1192,12 +1192,9 @@ static int ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)
return ret;
}
-static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool writelock)
+static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
- if (writelock)
- ufshcd_up_write(hba);
- else
- ufshcd_up_read(hba);
+ ufshcd_up_write(hba);
ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
ufshcd_release(hba);
}
@@ -1214,7 +1211,6 @@ static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool writelock)
static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
{
int ret = 0;
- bool is_writelock = true;
ret = ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(hba);
if (ret)
@@ -1244,12 +1240,10 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
}
/* Enable Write Booster if we have scaled up else disable it */
- ufshcd_downgrade_write(hba);
- is_writelock = false;
ufshcd_wb_toggle(hba, scale_up);
out_unprepare:
- ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(hba, is_writelock);
+ ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(hba);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 74891947bb34..47f81eae178c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -1457,10 +1457,4 @@ static inline void ufshcd_up_write(struct ufs_hba *hba)
up_write(&hba->host_rw_sem);
}
-static inline void ufshcd_downgrade_write(struct ufs_hba *hba)
-{
- hba->excl_task = NULL;
- downgrade_write(&hba->host_rw_sem);
-}
-
#endif /* End of Header */
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-04 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-04 12:06 [PATCH RFC 0/6] scsi: ufs: Start to make driver synchronization easier to understand Adrian Hunter
2021-10-04 12:06 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] scsi: ufs: Encapsulate clk_scaling_lock by inline functions Adrian Hunter
2021-10-04 12:06 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] scsi: ufs: Rename clk_scaling_lock to host_rw_sem Adrian Hunter
2021-10-04 16:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-05 5:06 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-10-05 19:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-04 12:06 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] scsi: ufs: Let ufshcd_[down/up]_read be nested within ufshcd_[down/up]_write Adrian Hunter
2021-10-04 12:06 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2021-10-04 12:06 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] scsi: ufs: Reorder dev_cmd locking Adrian Hunter
2021-10-04 12:06 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] scsi: ufs: Hold ufshcd_down_write() lock for entire error handler duration Adrian Hunter
2021-10-04 12:42 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] scsi: ufs: Start to make driver synchronization easier to understand Avri Altman
2021-10-04 13:27 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211004120650.153218-5-adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox