From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F6DC433F5 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3684E611C1 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239020AbhJOXUh (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:20:37 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:38298 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229741AbhJOXUf (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 19:20:35 -0400 X-UUID: 25a2eccd0dc445e1a5bbf513c075a338-20211016 X-UUID: 25a2eccd0dc445e1a5bbf513c075a338-20211016 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.40)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Generic MTA with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1093777851; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 07:18:23 +0800 Received: from mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.39) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 07:18:22 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas10.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 07:18:22 +0800 From: Miles Chen To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: fix crashes in sd_resume_runtime Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 07:18:05 +0800 Message-ID: <20211015231805.17509-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <14930227-aca0-89a0-25ea-727d263f8bf8@acm.org> References: <14930227-aca0-89a0-25ea-727d263f8bf8@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MTK: N Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > Thanks for the clarification. Given this clarification I'm fine with your patch. > Bart. thanks for your review Miles