[PATCH 1/1] target: Use RCU helpers for INQUIRY t10_alua_tg_pt_gp use

[Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>]

This fixes the sparse warnings about t10_alua_tg_pt_gp accesses in
target_core_spc.c from:

commit 7324f47d4293 ("scsi: target: Replace lun_tg_pt_gp_lock with rcu in
I/O path")

That patch replaced the lun_tg_pt_gp_lock use in the IO path, but didn't
update the INQUIRY code.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_spc.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
index 22703a0dbd07..4c76498d3fb0 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ static void spc_fill_alua_data(struct se_lun *lun, unsigned char *buf)
 	 *
 	 * See spc4r17 section 6.4.2 Table 135
 	 */
-	spin_lock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
-	tg_pt_gp = lun->lun_tg_pt_gp;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	tg_pt_gp = rcu_dereference(lun->lun_tg_pt_gp);
 	if (tg_pt_gp)
 		buf[5] |= tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_type;
-	spin_unlock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static u16
@@ -325,14 +325,14 @@ spc_emulate_evpd_83(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *buf)
 		 * Get the PROTOCOL IDENTIFIER as defined by spc4r17
 		 * section 7.5.1 Table 362
 		 */
-		spin_lock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
-		tg_pt_gp = lun->lun_tg_pt_gp;
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		tg_pt_gp = rcu_dereference(lun->lun_tg_pt_gp);
 		if (!tg_pt_gp) {
-			spin_unlock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			goto check_lu_gp;
 		}
 		tg_pt_gp_id = tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_id;
-		spin_unlock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 
 		buf[off] = tpg->proto_id << 4;
 		buf[off++] |= 0x1; /* CODE SET == Binary */
-- 
2.25.1