From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sr: simplify the local variable initialization in sr_block_open()
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:03:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220314150321.17720-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> (raw)
Commit 01d0c698536f ("sr: implement ->free_disk to simplify refcounting")
refactored sr_block_open(), initialized one variable with a duplicate
assignment (probably an unintended copy & paste duplication) and turned one
error case into an early return, which makes the initialization of the
return variable needless.
So, simplify the local variable initialization in sr_block_open() to make
the code a bit more clear.
No functional change. No change in resulting object code.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
---
Christoph, please ack.
Jens, please pick this minor clean-up on your -next branch on top of the
commit above.
drivers/scsi/sr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr.c b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
index 00142095522a..5ba9df334968 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
@@ -483,9 +483,9 @@ static void sr_revalidate_disk(struct scsi_cd *cd)
static int sr_block_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
{
- struct scsi_cd *cd = cd = scsi_cd(bdev->bd_disk);
+ struct scsi_cd *cd = scsi_cd(bdev->bd_disk);
struct scsi_device *sdev = cd->device;
- int ret = -ENXIO;
+ int ret;
if (scsi_device_get(cd->device))
return -ENXIO;
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 15:03 Lukas Bulwahn [this message]
2022-03-14 15:05 ` [PATCH] sr: simplify the local variable initialization in sr_block_open() Jens Axboe
2022-03-14 15:33 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2022-03-15 6:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-15 20:42 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220314150321.17720-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--to=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox