public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
	Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>,
	Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com>,
	"supporter:QLOGIC QLA2XXX FC-SCSI DRIVER" 
	<GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com>,
	"open list:SCSI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:MEGARAID SCSI/SAS DRIVERS" 
	<megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 30/39] scsi: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 11:06:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505160626.GA492390@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0=HgkkSJ2edZxMDbyuTyNZK98oSi4rc6CL_b6RHAQ-OQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:34:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 10:42 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:50:51PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > > those drivers using them.
> >
> > Some of these drivers support devices using either I/O ports or MMIO.
> > Adding the HAS_IOPORT dependency means MMIO devices that *could* work
> > on systems without I/O ports, won't work.
> >
> > Even the MMIO-only devices are probably old and not of much interest.
> > But if you want to disable them even though they *could* work, I think
> > that's worth mentioning in the commit log.
> 
> I think this would again make more sense with the original CONFIG_LEGACY_PCI
> conditional than the generic HAS_IOPORT one. I don't remember what the
> objection was to that symbol.

I didn't really like CONFIG_LEGACY_PCI because it wasn't clearly
defined.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220429135108.2781579-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [PATCH 19/37] mpt fusion: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 14:32   ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [RFC v2 20/39] " Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [PATCH 27/37] scsi: " Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 14:46   ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-29 13:50 ` [RFC v2 30/39] " Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-04 20:42   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-04 21:34     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-05 16:06       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220505160626.GA492390@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=njavali@marvell.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox