Re: [PATCH 4/4] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Use dev_err() where possible

Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-12-02T07:40:38Z

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:08:10PM -0600, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> dev_err() statements are better to use than pr_err(), so switch to
> those.
>
> In a similar vein, the check on the dev_req_params pointer here is
> not needed, the two places this function is called never pass in a
> NULL pointer, so instead of using dev_err() there just remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index b1fcff1fad0c..4350c44a6fc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -680,12 +680,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> struct ufs_dev_params ufs_qcom_cap;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!dev_req_params) {
> - pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> switch (status) {
> case PRE_CHANGE:
> ufshcd_init_pwr_dev_param(&ufs_qcom_cap);
> @@ -709,7 +703,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> dev_max_params,
> dev_req_params);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
> + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
> __func__);
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 2.38.1
>

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்