From: Justin Tee <justintee8345@gmail.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com, justin.tee@broadcom.com,
Justin Tee <justintee8345@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] lpfc: Defer issuing new PLOGI if received RSCN before completing REG_LOGIN
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:16:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301231626.9621-6-justintee8345@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230301231626.9621-1-justintee8345@gmail.com>
When mapped to a target with multiple virtual ports, a link bounce
sometimes results in unsuccessful rediscovery of all of the target's
virtual ports. This is because a succession of repeat RSCNs for the
virtual target ports leaves ndlps in the REG_LOGIN state with the
NLP_REG_LOGIN_SEND flag set. With NLP_REG_LOGIN_SEND set, during the next
PLOGI, the driver will UNREG_RPI. When UNREG_RPI is processed, the driver
can be in the middle of PRLI_ISSUE or MAPPED state resulting in an
illegal state transition by the discovery engine and stalling.
Fix by calling the discovery state machine with DEVICE_RECOVERY event
during RSCN processing. This will set the NLP_IGNR_REG_CMPL bit and
prevent the old REG_LOGIN state from advancing. Then for the new PLOGI
issue, add the check for the NLP_IGNR_REG_CMPL bit to delay issuing the new
PLOGI until the queued REG_LOGIN and UNREG_LOGIN have been processed.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
index 459e50836853..0342e8cdcc9e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
@@ -2208,14 +2208,15 @@ lpfc_issue_els_plogi(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint32_t did, uint8_t retry)
* outstanding UNREG_RPI mbox command completes, unless we
* are going offline. This logic does not apply for Fabric DIDs
*/
- if ((ndlp->nlp_flag & NLP_UNREG_INP) &&
+ if ((ndlp->nlp_flag & (NLP_IGNR_REG_CMPL | NLP_UNREG_INP)) &&
((ndlp->nlp_DID & Fabric_DID_MASK) != Fabric_DID_MASK) &&
!(vport->fc_flag & FC_OFFLINE_MODE)) {
lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_INFO, LOG_DISCOVERY,
"4110 Issue PLOGI x%x deferred "
- "on NPort x%x rpi x%x Data: x%px\n",
+ "on NPort x%x rpi x%x flg x%x Data:"
+ " x%px\n",
ndlp->nlp_defer_did, ndlp->nlp_DID,
- ndlp->nlp_rpi, ndlp);
+ ndlp->nlp_rpi, ndlp->nlp_flag, ndlp);
/* We can only defer 1st PLOGI */
if (ndlp->nlp_defer_did == NLP_EVT_NOTHING_PENDING)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
index 66cd0b1dbbd0..11ba26ac495a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
@@ -5755,8 +5755,8 @@ lpfc_setup_disc_node(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint32_t did)
(NLP_FCP_TARGET | NLP_NVME_TARGET)))
return NULL;
- ndlp->nlp_prev_state = ndlp->nlp_state;
- lpfc_nlp_set_state(vport, ndlp, NLP_STE_NPR_NODE);
+ lpfc_disc_state_machine(vport, ndlp, NULL,
+ NLP_EVT_DEVICE_RECOVERY);
spin_lock_irq(&ndlp->lock);
ndlp->nlp_flag |= NLP_NPR_2B_DISC;
--
2.38.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 23:16 [PATCH 00/10] lpfc: Update lpfc to revision 14.2.0.11 Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 01/10] lpfc: Protect against potential lpfc_debugfs_lockstat_write buffer overflow Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 02/10] lpfc: Reorder freeing of various dma buffers and their list removal Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 03/10] lpfc: Fix lockdep warning for rx_monitor lock when unloading driver Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 04/10] lpfc: Record LOGO state with discovery engine even if aborted Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` Justin Tee [this message]
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 06/10] lpfc: Correct used_rpi count when devloss tmo fires with no recovery Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 07/10] lpfc: Skip waiting for register ready bits when in unrecoverable state Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 08/10] lpfc: Revise lpfc_error_lost_link reason code evaluation logic Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 09/10] lpfc: Update lpfc version to 14.2.0.11 Justin Tee
2023-03-01 23:16 ` [PATCH 10/10] lpfc: Copyright updates for 14.2.0.11 patches Justin Tee
2023-03-07 3:04 ` [PATCH 00/10] lpfc: Update lpfc to revision 14.2.0.11 Martin K. Petersen
2023-03-10 3:14 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230301231626.9621-6-justintee8345@gmail.com \
--to=justintee8345@gmail.com \
--cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=justin.tee@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox