linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: simplify scsi_stop_queue()
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:34:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230607133449.GB20840@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e982c95ad7ee29f80e8c0ba88f0cece837e344b9.camel@suse.com> <c0563161eb613f9500e6a1cccdcff6fc64efffad.camel@suse.com>

On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > cleanups:
> > 
> >   1) remove scsi_internal_device_block and fold it into device_block
> 
> ok
> 
> >   2) move the scsi_internal_device_block in what was
> 
> You mean scsi_stop_queue() here, right?

Yes.

> The reason is simple: I wasn't certain if dev_to_shost() could return
> NULL, and preferred skipping the wait over an Oops. I hear you say that
> dev_to_shost() can't go wrong, so I'll remove the NULL test.

Well, the parent device can't really go away while we have a reference
to a child.  So the only case where it can return NULL is if the
passed in device isn't the child of a SCSI host, which would be a grave
programming error.

> 
> > Btw, as far as I can tell scsi_target_block is never called for
> > a device that is a target device.  It might be worth throwing in
> > another patch to remove support for that case and simplify things
> > further.
> 
> Can we do this separately, maybe? 

Sure.  Would be nice to just tack into onto the end of this series
if you touch the area, though.

> On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 11:26 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 07:27 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > 
> > >   3) remove scsi_stop_queue and open code it in the two callers,
> > > one
> > >      of which currently wants nowait semantics, and one that
> > > doesn't.
> > ok
> 
> Hm, scsi_stop_queue() pairs with scsi_start_queue(), do we really want
> to open-code it?

Oh well, feel free to keep it if you prefer it that way.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-07 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-06 19:38 [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: fixes for targets with many LUNs mwilck
2023-06-06 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] bsg: increase number of devices mwilck
2023-06-07  5:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-06 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: sg: " mwilck
2023-06-07  5:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-06 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: simplify scsi_stop_queue() mwilck
2023-06-07  5:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-07  9:26     ` Martin Wilck
2023-06-07  9:36       ` Martin Wilck
2023-06-07 13:34         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-06-07 14:05       ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-07 14:08         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-07 15:38         ` Martin Wilck
2023-06-07 16:39           ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-07 17:56             ` Martin Wilck
2023-06-06 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: fixes for targets with many LUNs Bart Van Assche
2023-06-07  1:20 ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230607133449.GB20840@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mwilck@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).