public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/9] block/mq-deadline: Only use zone locking if necessary
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 14:35:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230811213604.548235-3-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811213604.548235-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

Measurements have shown that limiting the queue depth to one per zone for
zoned writes has a significant negative performance impact on zoned UFS
devices. Hence this patch that disables zone locking by the mq-deadline
scheduler if the storage controller preserves the command order. This
patch is based on the following assumptions:
- It happens infrequently that zoned write requests are reordered by the
  block layer.
- The I/O priority of all write requests is the same per zone.
- Either no I/O scheduler is used or an I/O scheduler is used that
  serializes write requests per zone.

Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 block/mq-deadline.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index f958e79277b8..5c2fc4003bc0 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
 		return NULL;
 
 	rq = rq_entry_fifo(per_prio->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
-	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock)
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, struct dd_per_prio *per_prio,
 	if (!rq)
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !blk_queue_is_zoned(rq->q))
+	if (data_dir == DD_READ || !rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock)
 		return rq;
 
 	/*
@@ -526,8 +526,9 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * For a zoned block device, if we only have writes queued and none of
-	 * them can be dispatched, rq will be NULL.
+	 * For a zoned block device that requires write serialization, if we
+	 * only have writes queued and none of them can be dispatched, rq will
+	 * be NULL.
 	 */
 	if (!rq)
 		return NULL;
@@ -552,7 +553,8 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd,
 	/*
 	 * If the request needs its target zone locked, do it.
 	 */
-	blk_req_zone_write_lock(rq);
+	if (rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock)
+		blk_req_zone_write_lock(rq);
 	rq->rq_flags |= RQF_STARTED;
 	return rq;
 }
@@ -934,7 +936,7 @@ static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 
 	atomic_inc(&per_prio->stats.completed);
 
-	if (blk_queue_is_zoned(q)) {
+	if (rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-11 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11 21:35 [PATCH v8 0/9] Improve performance for zoned UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] block: Introduce more member variables related to zone write locking Bart Van Assche
2023-08-14 12:32   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14 16:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-15  2:01       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-15 16:06         ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2023-08-14 12:33   ` [PATCH v8 2/9] block/mq-deadline: Only use zone locking if necessary Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14 17:00     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-15  1:57       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] scsi: core: Call .eh_prepare_resubmit() before resubmitting Bart Van Assche
2023-08-14  1:19   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14  2:18     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-14  2:41       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14  3:23         ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-14  4:18           ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14 17:52             ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] scsi: sd: Sort commands by LBA " Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] scsi: core: Retry unaligned zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2023-08-14 12:36   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-14 17:57     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-15  1:52       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-15 17:29     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16  1:13       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:59         ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] scsi: scsi_debug: Support disabling zone write locking Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] scsi: scsi_debug: Support injecting unaligned write errors Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] scsi: ufs: Split an if-condition Bart Van Assche
2023-08-11 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] scsi: ufs: Inform the block layer about write ordering Bart Van Assche
2023-08-12 17:09   ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-14 16:23     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-15  3:20       ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-15 15:41         ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230811213604.548235-3-bvanassche@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox