public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] zfcp: do not wait for rports to become unblocked after host reset
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2023 17:49:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231002154927.68643-2-hare@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231002154927.68643-1-hare@suse.de>

zfcp_scsi_eh_host_reset_handler() would call fc_block_rport() to
wait for all rports to become unblocked after host reset.
But after host reset it might happen that the port is gone, hence
fc_block_rport() might fail due to a missing port.
But that's a perfectly legal operation; on FC remote ports might
come and go.
In the same vein FC HBAs are able to deal with ports being temporarily
blocked, so really there is not point in waiting for all ports
to become unblocked during host reset.
Hence remove the call to fc_block_rport() in host reset.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com
Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
index b2a8cd792266..14f929cca271 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
@@ -383,10 +383,6 @@ static int zfcp_scsi_eh_host_reset_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *scpnt)
 	}
 	zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen(adapter, 0, "schrh_1");
 	zfcp_erp_wait(adapter);
-	fc_ret = fc_block_scsi_eh(scpnt);
-	if (fc_ret)
-		ret = fc_ret;
-
 	zfcp_dbf_scsi_eh("schrh_r", adapter, ~0, ret);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.35.3


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-02 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-02 15:49 [PATCHv500/15] scsi: EH rework prep patches, part 2 Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-10-12 13:54   ` [PATCH 01/15] zfcp: do not wait for rports to become unblocked after host reset Benjamin Block
2023-10-12 14:23     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-12 17:49       ` Benjamin Block
2023-10-13  6:18         ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 02/15] bfa: Do not use scsi command to signal TMF status Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 03/15] aha152x: look for stuck command when resetting device Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 04/15] a1000u2w: do not rely on the command for inia100_device_reset() Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 05/15] fas216: Rework device reset to not rely on SCSI command pointer Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 06/15] xen-scsifront: add scsi device as argument to scsifront_do_request() Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 07/15] xen-scsifront: rework scsifront_action_handler() Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 08/15] libiscsi: use cls_session as argument for target and session reset Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 09/15] scsi_transport_iscsi: use session as argument for iscsi_block_scsi_eh() Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 10/15] snic: reserve tag for TMF Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 11/15] snic: allocate device reset command Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 12/15] snic: Use scsi_host_busy_iter() to traverse commands Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 13/15] fnic: allocate device reset command on the fly Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 14/15] fnic: use fc_block_rport() correctly Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-02 15:49 ` [PATCH 15/15] csiostor: use separate TMF command Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231002154927.68643-2-hare@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox