From: Justin Tee <justintee8345@gmail.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com, justin.tee@broadcom.com,
Justin Tee <justintee8345@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] lpfc: Introduce rrq_list_lock to protect active_rrq_list
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:15:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240429221547.6842-5-justintee8345@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429221547.6842-1-justintee8345@gmail.com>
Instead of using the generic object wide phba->hbalock, an explicit lock
should be used to synchronize mutations to the phba->active_rrq_list.
Update all accesses to the phba->active_rrq_list with a new
phba->rrq_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h | 1 +
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 1 +
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c | 2 ++
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 4 +++-
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
index 98ca7df003ef..44a7155daf61 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.h
@@ -1284,6 +1284,7 @@ struct lpfc_hba {
uint32_t total_scsi_bufs;
struct list_head lpfc_iocb_list;
uint32_t total_iocbq_bufs;
+ spinlock_t rrq_list_lock; /* lock for active_rrq_list */
struct list_head active_rrq_list;
spinlock_t hbalock;
struct work_struct unblock_request_work; /* SCSI layer unblock IOs */
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index f7a0aa3625f4..bd8f97cab2c6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -14812,6 +14812,7 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one_s4(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pid)
goto out_unset_pci_mem_s4;
}
+ spin_lock_init(&phba->rrq_list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->active_rrq_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->fcf.fcf_pri_list);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
index 561ced5503c6..0b91de86d845 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvmet.c
@@ -1811,7 +1811,9 @@ lpfc_sli4_nvmet_xri_aborted(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
ctxp->flag &= ~LPFC_NVME_XBUSY;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctxp->ctxlock, iflag);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflag);
rrq_empty = list_empty(&phba->active_rrq_list);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflag);
ndlp = lpfc_findnode_did(phba->pport, ctxp->sid);
if (ndlp &&
(ndlp->nlp_state == NLP_STE_UNMAPPED_NODE ||
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index 89a622e3053e..8ff39cd9c7e2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -474,9 +474,11 @@ lpfc_sli4_io_xri_aborted(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
ndlp = psb->rdata->pnode;
else
ndlp = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflag);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflag);
rrq_empty = list_empty(&phba->active_rrq_list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflag);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflag);
if (ndlp && !offline) {
lpfc_set_rrq_active(phba, ndlp,
psb->cur_iocbq.sli4_lxritag, rxid, 1);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index fa3d458af193..c64151cd205e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -1026,7 +1026,10 @@ lpfc_handle_rrq_active(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
phba->hba_flag &= ~HBA_RRQ_ACTIVE;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+
next_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * (phba->fc_ratov + 1));
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rrq, nextrrq,
&phba->active_rrq_list, list) {
if (time_after(jiffies, rrq->rrq_stop_time))
@@ -1034,7 +1037,7 @@ lpfc_handle_rrq_active(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
else if (time_before(rrq->rrq_stop_time, next_time))
next_time = rrq->rrq_stop_time;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
if ((!list_empty(&phba->active_rrq_list)) &&
(!test_bit(FC_UNLOADING, &phba->pport->load_flag)))
mod_timer(&phba->rrq_tmr, next_time);
@@ -1072,16 +1075,16 @@ lpfc_get_active_rrq(struct lpfc_vport *vport, uint16_t xri, uint32_t did)
if (phba->sli_rev != LPFC_SLI_REV4)
return NULL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rrq, nextrrq, &phba->active_rrq_list, list) {
if (rrq->vport == vport && rrq->xritag == xri &&
rrq->nlp_DID == did){
list_del(&rrq->list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
return rrq;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
return NULL;
}
@@ -1109,7 +1112,7 @@ lpfc_cleanup_vports_rrqs(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp)
lpfc_sli4_vport_delete_els_xri_aborted(vport);
lpfc_sli4_vport_delete_fcp_xri_aborted(vport);
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rrq, nextrrq, &phba->active_rrq_list, list) {
if (rrq->vport != vport)
continue;
@@ -1118,7 +1121,7 @@ lpfc_cleanup_vports_rrqs(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp)
list_move(&rrq->list, &rrq_list);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rrq, nextrrq, &rrq_list, list) {
list_del(&rrq->list);
@@ -1213,11 +1216,16 @@ lpfc_set_rrq_active(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp,
rrq->nlp_DID = ndlp->nlp_DID;
rrq->vport = ndlp->vport;
rrq->rxid = rxid;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
empty = list_empty(&phba->active_rrq_list);
list_add_tail(&rrq->list, &phba->active_rrq_list);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->rrq_list_lock, iflags);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
phba->hba_flag |= HBA_RRQ_ACTIVE;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
+
if (empty)
lpfc_worker_wake_up(phba);
return 0;
--
2.38.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 22:15 [PATCH 0/8] Update lpfc to revision 14.4.0.2 Justin Tee
2024-04-29 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] lpfc: Change default logging level for unsolicited CT MIB commands Justin Tee
2024-04-29 22:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] lpfc: Update logging of protection type for T10 DIF I/O Justin Tee
2024-04-29 22:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] lpfc: Clear deferred RSCN processing flag when driver is unloading Justin Tee
2024-04-29 22:15 ` Justin Tee [this message]
2024-04-29 22:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] lpfc: Change lpfc_hba hba_flag member into a bitmask Justin Tee
2024-04-29 22:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] lpfc: Add support for 32 byte CDBs Justin Tee
2024-04-29 22:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] lpfc: Update lpfc version to 14.4.0.2 Justin Tee
2024-04-29 22:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] lpfc: Copyright updates for 14.4.0.2 patches Justin Tee
2024-05-07 1:58 ` [PATCH 0/8] Update lpfc to revision 14.4.0.2 Martin K. Petersen
2024-05-11 18:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240429221547.6842-5-justintee8345@gmail.com \
--to=justintee8345@gmail.com \
--cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=justin.tee@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox