From: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>
To: <don.brace@microchip.com>, <Kevin.Barnett@microchip.com>,
<scott.teel@microchip.com>, <Justin.Lindley@microchip.com>,
<scott.benesh@microchip.com>, <gerry.morong@microchip.com>,
<mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com>, <mike.mcgowen@microchip.com>,
<murthy.bhat@microchip.com>, <kumar.meiyappan@microchip.com>,
<jeremy.reeves@microchip.com>, <david.strahan@microchip.com>,
<hch@infradead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<joseph.szczypek@hpe.com>, <POSWALD@suse.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] smartpqi: improve accuracy/performance of raid-bypass-counter.
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:47:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711194704.982400-3-don.brace@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711194704.982400-1-don.brace@microchip.com>
From: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microchip.com>
The original implementation of this counter used an atomic variable.
However, this implementation negatively impacted performance in some
configurations.
Switch to using per_cpu variables.
Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh <scott.benesh@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Scott Teel <scott.teel@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike McGowen <mike.mcgowen@microchip.com>
Co-developed-by: Mahesh Rajashekhara <mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Rajashekhara <mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>
---
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
index cdedc271857a..023fbce04e7a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ struct pqi_scsi_dev {
struct pqi_stream_data stream_data[NUM_STREAMS_PER_LUN];
atomic_t scsi_cmds_outstanding[PQI_MAX_LUNS_PER_DEVICE];
- unsigned int raid_bypass_cnt;
+ u64 __percpu *raid_bypass_cnt;
struct pqi_tmf_work tmf_work[PQI_MAX_LUNS_PER_DEVICE];
};
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
index 9166dfa1fedc..eaebe3cc00aa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
@@ -1508,6 +1508,12 @@ static int pqi_get_raid_map(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
if (rc)
goto error;
+ device->raid_bypass_cnt = alloc_percpu(u64);
+ if (!device->raid_bypass_cnt) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
device->raid_map = raid_map;
return 0;
@@ -2099,6 +2105,10 @@ static void pqi_scsi_update_device(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
/* To prevent this from being freed later. */
new_device->raid_map = NULL;
}
+ if (new_device->raid_bypass_enabled && existing_device->raid_bypass_cnt == NULL) {
+ existing_device->raid_bypass_cnt = new_device->raid_bypass_cnt;
+ new_device->raid_bypass_cnt = NULL;
+ }
existing_device->raid_bypass_configured = new_device->raid_bypass_configured;
existing_device->raid_bypass_enabled = new_device->raid_bypass_enabled;
}
@@ -2121,6 +2131,7 @@ static void pqi_scsi_update_device(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
static inline void pqi_free_device(struct pqi_scsi_dev *device)
{
if (device) {
+ free_percpu(device->raid_bypass_cnt);
kfree(device->raid_map);
kfree(device);
}
@@ -6007,6 +6018,7 @@ static int pqi_scsi_queue_command(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scm
u16 hw_queue;
struct pqi_queue_group *queue_group;
bool raid_bypassed;
+ u64 *raid_bypass_cnt;
u8 lun;
scmd->host_scribble = PQI_NO_COMPLETION;
@@ -6053,7 +6065,8 @@ static int pqi_scsi_queue_command(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scm
rc = pqi_raid_bypass_submit_scsi_cmd(ctrl_info, device, scmd, queue_group);
if (rc == 0 || rc == SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY) {
raid_bypassed = true;
- device->raid_bypass_cnt++;
+ raid_bypass_cnt = per_cpu_ptr(device->raid_bypass_cnt, smp_processor_id());
+ (*raid_bypass_cnt)++;
}
}
if (!raid_bypassed)
@@ -7350,7 +7363,9 @@ static ssize_t pqi_raid_bypass_cnt_show(struct device *dev,
struct scsi_device *sdev;
struct pqi_scsi_dev *device;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned int raid_bypass_cnt;
+ u64 raid_bypass_cnt;
+ int cpu;
+ u64 *per_cpu_bypass_cnt_ptr;
sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(sdev->host);
@@ -7366,11 +7381,18 @@ static ssize_t pqi_raid_bypass_cnt_show(struct device *dev,
return -ENODEV;
}
- raid_bypass_cnt = device->raid_bypass_cnt;
+ raid_bypass_cnt = 0;
+
+ if (device->raid_bypass_cnt) {
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ per_cpu_bypass_cnt_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(device->raid_bypass_cnt, cpu);
+ raid_bypass_cnt += *per_cpu_bypass_cnt_ptr;
+ }
+ }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl_info->scsi_device_list_lock, flags);
- return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%x\n", raid_bypass_cnt);
+ return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%llx\n", raid_bypass_cnt);
}
static ssize_t pqi_sas_ncq_prio_enable_show(struct device *dev,
--
2.45.2.827.g557ae147e6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 19:46 [PATCH 0/5] smartpqi updates Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] smartpqi: add new controller PCI IDs Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` Don Brace [this message]
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] smartpqi: revert propagate-the-multipath-failure-to-SML-quickly Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] smartpqi: fix improve handling of multipath failover Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] smartpqi: update driver version to 2.1.28-025 Don Brace
2024-08-03 2:12 ` [PATCH 0/5] smartpqi updates Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-05 21:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711194704.982400-3-don.brace@microchip.com \
--to=don.brace@microchip.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Justin.Lindley@microchip.com \
--cc=Kevin.Barnett@microchip.com \
--cc=POSWALD@suse.com \
--cc=david.strahan@microchip.com \
--cc=gerry.morong@microchip.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeremy.reeves@microchip.com \
--cc=joseph.szczypek@hpe.com \
--cc=kumar.meiyappan@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mike.mcgowen@microchip.com \
--cc=murthy.bhat@microchip.com \
--cc=scott.benesh@microchip.com \
--cc=scott.teel@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox