From: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>
To: <don.brace@microchip.com>, <Kevin.Barnett@microchip.com>,
<scott.teel@microchip.com>, <Justin.Lindley@microchip.com>,
<scott.benesh@microchip.com>, <gerry.morong@microchip.com>,
<mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com>, <mike.mcgowen@microchip.com>,
<murthy.bhat@microchip.com>, <kumar.meiyappan@microchip.com>,
<jeremy.reeves@microchip.com>, <david.strahan@microchip.com>,
<hch@infradead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<joseph.szczypek@hpe.com>, <POSWALD@suse.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] smartpqi: revert propagate-the-multipath-failure-to-SML-quickly
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:47:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711194704.982400-4-don.brace@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711194704.982400-1-don.brace@microchip.com>
From: Gilbert Wu <Gilbert.Wu@microchip.com>
Correct a rare multipath failure issue by reverting:
commit 94a68c814328
("scsi: smartpqi: Quickly propagate path failures to SCSI midlayer")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/164375209313.440833.9992416628621839233.stgit@brunhilda.pdev.net/
Reason for revert: The patch propagated the path failure to SML
quickly when one of the path fails during IO and AIO path gets
disabled for a multipath device.
But it created a new issue: when creating a volume on an
encryption-enabled controller, the firmware reports the AIO path is
disabled, which cause the driver to report a path failure to SML for
a multipath device.
There will be a new fix to handle "Illegal request" and "Invalid field
in parameter list" on RAID path when the AIO path is disabled on a
multipath device.
Fixes: 94a68c814328 ("scsi: smartpqi: Quickly propagate path failures to SCSI midlayer")
Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh <scott.benesh@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Scott Teel <scott.teel@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike McGowen <mike.mcgowen@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Gilbert Wu <Gilbert.Wu@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>
---
drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c | 20 ++------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
index eaebe3cc00aa..d8df7440bbe1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
@@ -2365,14 +2365,6 @@ static inline void pqi_mask_device(u8 *scsi3addr)
scsi3addr[3] |= 0xc0;
}
-static inline bool pqi_is_multipath_device(struct pqi_scsi_dev *device)
-{
- if (pqi_is_logical_device(device))
- return false;
-
- return (device->path_map & (device->path_map - 1)) != 0;
-}
-
static inline bool pqi_expose_device(struct pqi_scsi_dev *device)
{
return !device->is_physical_device || !pqi_skip_device(device->scsi3addr);
@@ -3269,14 +3261,12 @@ static void pqi_process_aio_io_error(struct pqi_io_request *io_request)
int residual_count;
int xfer_count;
bool device_offline;
- struct pqi_scsi_dev *device;
scmd = io_request->scmd;
error_info = io_request->error_info;
host_byte = DID_OK;
sense_data_length = 0;
device_offline = false;
- device = scmd->device->hostdata;
switch (error_info->service_response) {
case PQI_AIO_SERV_RESPONSE_COMPLETE:
@@ -3301,14 +3291,8 @@ static void pqi_process_aio_io_error(struct pqi_io_request *io_request)
break;
case PQI_AIO_STATUS_AIO_PATH_DISABLED:
pqi_aio_path_disabled(io_request);
- if (pqi_is_multipath_device(device)) {
- pqi_device_remove_start(device);
- host_byte = DID_NO_CONNECT;
- scsi_status = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
- } else {
- scsi_status = SAM_STAT_GOOD;
- io_request->status = -EAGAIN;
- }
+ scsi_status = SAM_STAT_GOOD;
+ io_request->status = -EAGAIN;
break;
case PQI_AIO_STATUS_NO_PATH_TO_DEVICE:
case PQI_AIO_STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE:
--
2.45.2.827.g557ae147e6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 19:46 [PATCH 0/5] smartpqi updates Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] smartpqi: add new controller PCI IDs Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] smartpqi: improve accuracy/performance of raid-bypass-counter Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` Don Brace [this message]
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] smartpqi: fix improve handling of multipath failover Don Brace
2024-07-11 19:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] smartpqi: update driver version to 2.1.28-025 Don Brace
2024-08-03 2:12 ` [PATCH 0/5] smartpqi updates Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-05 21:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711194704.982400-4-don.brace@microchip.com \
--to=don.brace@microchip.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Justin.Lindley@microchip.com \
--cc=Kevin.Barnett@microchip.com \
--cc=POSWALD@suse.com \
--cc=david.strahan@microchip.com \
--cc=gerry.morong@microchip.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeremy.reeves@microchip.com \
--cc=joseph.szczypek@hpe.com \
--cc=kumar.meiyappan@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mike.mcgowen@microchip.com \
--cc=murthy.bhat@microchip.com \
--cc=scott.benesh@microchip.com \
--cc=scott.teel@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox