linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
	Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v22 14/14] ufs: core: Inform the block layer about write ordering
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:57:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250724215703.2910510-15-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250724215703.2910510-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

From the UFSHCI 4.0 specification, about the MCQ mode:
"Command Submission
1. Host SW writes an Entry to SQ
2. Host SW updates SQ doorbell tail pointer

Command Processing
3. After fetching the Entry, Host Controller updates SQ doorbell head
   pointer
4. Host controller sends COMMAND UPIU to UFS device"

In other words, in MCQ mode, UFS controllers are required to forward
commands to the UFS device in the order these commands have been
received from the host.

This patch improves performance as follows on a test setup with UFSHCI
4.0 controller:
- When not using an I/O scheduler: 2.3x more IOPS for small writes.
- With the mq-deadline scheduler: 2.0x more IOPS for small writes.

Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Cc: Bao D. Nguyen <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>
Cc: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 50adfb8b335b..6ff097e2c919 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -5281,6 +5281,13 @@ static int ufshcd_sdev_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev,
 	struct ufs_hba *hba = shost_priv(sdev->host);
 	struct request_queue *q = sdev->request_queue;
 
+	/*
+	 * The write order is preserved per MCQ. Without MCQ, auto-hibernation
+	 * may cause write reordering that results in unaligned write errors.
+	 */
+	if (hba->mcq_enabled)
+		lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_ORDERED_HWQ;
+
 	lim->dma_pad_mask = PRDT_DATA_BYTE_COUNT_PAD - 1;
 
 	/*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-24 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-24 21:56 [PATCH v22 00/14] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 01/14] block: Support block devices that preserve the order of write requests Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 02/14] blk-mq: Always insert sequential zoned writes into a software queue Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 03/14] blk-mq: Restore the zone write order when requeuing Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 04/14] blk-zoned: Add an argument to blk_zone_plug_bio() Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 05/14] blk-zoned: Split an if-statement Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 06/14] blk-zoned: Move code from disk_zone_wplug_add_bio() into its caller Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 07/14] blk-zoned: Introduce a loop in blk_zone_wplug_bio_work() Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 08/14] blk-zoned: Support pipelining of zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 09/14] null_blk: Add the preserves_write_order attribute Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:56 ` [PATCH v22 10/14] scsi: core: Retry unaligned zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v22 11/14] scsi: sd: Increase retry count for " Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v22 12/14] scsi: scsi_debug: Add the preserves_write_order module parameter Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v22 13/14] scsi: scsi_debug: Support injecting unaligned write errors Bart Van Assche
2025-07-24 21:57 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-08-01  8:04   ` [PATCH v22 14/14] ufs: core: Inform the block layer about write ordering Can Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250724215703.2910510-15-bvanassche@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).