* [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures Ewan D. Milne
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
We encountered a SCSI device that responded to the initial READ CAPACITY command
with a good status, but no data was transferred. This caused a sudden change of
the device capacity to zero when the device was rescanned, for no obvious reason.
This patch series changes read_capacity_10() and read_capacity_16() in sd.c
to retry the command up to 3 times in an attempt to get valid capacity information.
A message is logged if this is ultimately unsuccessful.
There are some predecessor patches, one from a patch in a series by Mike Christie
which changes read_capacity_16() to use the scsi_failures mechanism (which did
not eventually get merged), this makes the changes here much more similar for
both the read_capacity_10 and read_capacity_16() case. Another patch corrects
a potential use of an uninitialized variable, and a third one removes a check
for -EOVERFLOW that hasn't been needed since commit 72deb455b5ec
("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF"). Other patches fill in missing .ascq entries
in the scsi_failures array and address other review comments.
The final patch to scsi_debug is allow insertion of the fault to test this change.
Changes in v3:
- Removed patch to pass the length of the buffer through the sd_read_capacity()
call chain and adjusted other patches accordingly. Use RC10/16_LEN for memset()
- Removed supurfluous parenthesis in conditionals
Changes in v2:
- Added patches to explicitly specify .ascq in scsi_features usage
- Pass the length of the buffer used through the sd_read_capacity() call chain
- Simplify a conditional in scsi_probe_lun() that was requested in similar
code in read_capacity_16()/read_capacity_10()
- Changed code in scsi_debug() to make only one call to scsi_set_resid()
- Moved some declarations around in read_capacity_16()/read_capacity_10()
and memset() the whole buffer instead of the expected data size
- Add the newly added flag SDEBUG_NO_DATA to SDEBUG_OPT_ALL_INJECTING
Ewan D. Milne (8):
scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures
scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC
0x3a
scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors
scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to
read_capacity_error()
scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity()
scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16)
returning no data
scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun()
scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good
status
drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 47 ++++++++---
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 7 +-
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:36 ` Damien Le Moal
` (2 more replies)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a Ewan D. Milne
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 3 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
This does not change any behavior (since .ascq was initialized to 0 by
the compiler) but makes explicit that the entry in the scsi_failures
array does not handle cases where ASCQ is nonzero, consistent with other
usage.
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 2 ++
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
index 3c6e089e80c3..c754b1d566e0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@@ -660,11 +660,13 @@ static int scsi_probe_lun(struct scsi_device *sdev, unsigned char *inq_result,
{
.sense = UNIT_ATTENTION,
.asc = 0x28,
+ .ascq = 0x00,
.result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
},
{
.sense = UNIT_ATTENTION,
.asc = 0x29,
+ .ascq = 0x00,
.result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
},
{
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 5b8668accf8e..78f5903cc8d0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2740,6 +2740,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
{
.sense = UNIT_ATTENTION,
.asc = 0x29,
+ .ascq = 0x00,
.allowed = READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET,
.result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
},
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:37 ` Damien Le Moal
` (2 more replies)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors Ewan D. Milne
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 3 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
This makes the handling in read_capacity_10() consistent with other
cases, e.g. sd_spinup_disk(). Omitting .ascq in scsi_failure did not
result in wildcard matching, it only handled ASCQ 0x00. This patch
changes the retry behavior, we no longer retry 3 times on ASC 0x3a
if a nonzero ASCQ is ever returned.
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 78f5903cc8d0..e3b802b26f0e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2729,11 +2729,13 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
{
.sense = UNIT_ATTENTION,
.asc = 0x3A,
+ .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY,
.result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
},
{
.sense = NOT_READY,
.asc = 0x3A,
+ .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY,
.result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
},
/* Device reset might occur several times so retry a lot */
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:42 ` Damien Le Moal
` (2 more replies)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error() Ewan D. Milne
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 3 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
This has read_capacity_16 have scsi-ml retry errors instead of driving
them itself.
There are 2 behavior changes with this patch:
1. There is one behavior change where we no longer retry when
scsi_execute_cmd returns < 0, but we should be ok. We don't need to retry
for failures like the queue being removed, and for the case where there
are no tags/reqs since the block layer waits/retries for us. For possible
memory allocation failures from blk_rq_map_kern we use GFP_NOIO, so
retrying will probably not help.
2. For the specific UAs we checked for and retried, we would get
READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET retries plus whatever retries were left
from the main loop's retries. Each UA now gets
READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET reties, and the other errors get up to 3
retries. This is most likely ok, because READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET
is already 10 and is not based on anything specific like a spec or
device, so the extra 3 we got from the main loop was probably just an
accident and is not going to help.
Original patch by Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> modified
based upon review comments for an earlier version of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index e3b802b26f0e..25561d01f972 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2631,14 +2631,66 @@ static void read_capacity_error(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
struct queue_limits *lim, unsigned char *buffer)
{
- unsigned char cmd[16];
+ static const u8 cmd[16] = {
+ [0] = SERVICE_ACTION_IN_16,
+ [1] = SAI_READ_CAPACITY_16,
+ [13] = RC16_LEN,
+ };
struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ struct scsi_failure failure_defs[] = {
+ /*
+ * Do not retry Invalid Command Operation Code or Invalid
+ * Field in CDB.
+ */
+ {
+ .sense = ILLEGAL_REQUEST,
+ .asc = 0x20,
+ .ascq = 0x00,
+ .result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
+ },
+ {
+ .sense = ILLEGAL_REQUEST,
+ .asc = 0x24,
+ .ascq = 0x00,
+ .result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
+ },
+ /* Do not retry Medium Not Present */
+ {
+ .sense = UNIT_ATTENTION,
+ .asc = 0x3A,
+ .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY,
+ .result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
+ },
+ {
+ .sense = NOT_READY,
+ .asc = 0x3A,
+ .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY,
+ .result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
+ },
+ /* Device reset might occur several times so retry a lot */
+ {
+ .sense = UNIT_ATTENTION,
+ .asc = 0x29,
+ .ascq = 0x00,
+ .allowed = READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET,
+ .result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
+ },
+ /* Any other error not listed above retry 3 times */
+ {
+ .result = SCMD_FAILURE_RESULT_ANY,
+ .allowed = 3,
+ },
+ {}
+ };
+ struct scsi_failures failures = {
+ .failure_definitions = failure_defs,
+ };
const struct scsi_exec_args exec_args = {
.sshdr = &sshdr,
+ .failures = &failures,
};
int sense_valid = 0;
int the_result;
- int retries = 3, reset_retries = READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET;
unsigned int alignment;
unsigned long long lba;
unsigned sector_size;
@@ -2646,40 +2698,27 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
if (sdp->no_read_capacity_16)
return -EINVAL;
- do {
- memset(cmd, 0, 16);
- cmd[0] = SERVICE_ACTION_IN_16;
- cmd[1] = SAI_READ_CAPACITY_16;
- cmd[13] = RC16_LEN;
- memset(buffer, 0, RC16_LEN);
-
- the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN,
- buffer, RC16_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT,
- sdkp->max_retries, &exec_args);
- if (the_result > 0) {
- if (media_not_present(sdkp, &sshdr))
- return -ENODEV;
+ memset(buffer, 0, RC16_LEN);
- sense_valid = scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr);
- if (sense_valid &&
- sshdr.sense_key == ILLEGAL_REQUEST &&
- (sshdr.asc == 0x20 || sshdr.asc == 0x24) &&
- sshdr.ascq == 0x00)
- /* Invalid Command Operation Code or
- * Invalid Field in CDB, just retry
- * silently with RC10 */
- return -EINVAL;
- if (sense_valid &&
- sshdr.sense_key == UNIT_ATTENTION &&
- sshdr.asc == 0x29 && sshdr.ascq == 0x00)
- /* Device reset might occur several times,
- * give it one more chance */
- if (--reset_retries > 0)
- continue;
- }
- retries--;
+ the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, buffer,
+ RC16_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT, sdkp->max_retries,
+ &exec_args);
- } while (the_result && retries);
+ if (the_result > 0) {
+ if (media_not_present(sdkp, &sshdr))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ sense_valid = scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr);
+ if (sense_valid && sshdr.sense_key == ILLEGAL_REQUEST &&
+ (sshdr.asc == 0x20 || sshdr.asc == 0x24) &&
+ sshdr.ascq == 0x00) {
+ /*
+ * Invalid Command Operation Code or Invalid Field in
+ * CDB, just retry silently with RC10
+ */
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
if (the_result) {
sd_print_result(sdkp, "Read Capacity(16) failed", the_result);
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error()
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:44 ` Damien Le Moal
` (2 more replies)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() Ewan D. Milne
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 3 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
read_capacity_10() sets "sense_valid" in a different conditional statement prior to
calling read_capacity_error(), and does not use this value otherwise. Move the call
to scsi_sense_valid() to read_capacity_error() instead of passing it as a parameter
from read_capacity_16() and read_capacity_10().
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 25561d01f972..d465609a66e3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2597,9 +2597,10 @@ static void sd_config_protection(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
}
static void read_capacity_error(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
- struct scsi_sense_hdr *sshdr, int sense_valid,
- int the_result)
+ struct scsi_sense_hdr *sshdr, int the_result)
{
+ bool sense_valid = scsi_sense_valid(sshdr);
+
if (sense_valid)
sd_print_sense_hdr(sdkp, sshdr);
else
@@ -2722,7 +2723,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
if (the_result) {
sd_print_result(sdkp, "Read Capacity(16) failed", the_result);
- read_capacity_error(sdkp, sdp, &sshdr, sense_valid, the_result);
+ read_capacity_error(sdkp, sdp, &sshdr, the_result);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -2799,7 +2800,6 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
.sshdr = &sshdr,
.failures = &failures,
};
- int sense_valid = 0;
int the_result;
sector_t lba;
unsigned sector_size;
@@ -2811,15 +2811,13 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
&exec_args);
if (the_result > 0) {
- sense_valid = scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr);
-
if (media_not_present(sdkp, &sshdr))
return -ENODEV;
}
if (the_result) {
sd_print_result(sdkp, "Read Capacity(10) failed", the_result);
- read_capacity_error(sdkp, sdp, &sshdr, sense_valid, the_result);
+ read_capacity_error(sdkp, sdp, &sshdr, the_result);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity()
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error() Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
` (2 more replies)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data Ewan D. Milne
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 3 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() because this value has not
been returned to it since commit 72deb455b5ec ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF").
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index d465609a66e3..acd79e9a0d82 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2863,8 +2863,6 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim,
if (sd_try_rc16_first(sdp)) {
sector_size = read_capacity_16(sdkp, sdp, lim, buffer);
- if (sector_size == -EOVERFLOW)
- goto got_data;
if (sector_size == -ENODEV)
return;
if (sector_size < 0)
@@ -2873,8 +2871,6 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim,
return;
} else {
sector_size = read_capacity_10(sdkp, sdp, buffer);
- if (sector_size == -EOVERFLOW)
- goto got_data;
if (sector_size < 0)
return;
if ((sizeof(sdkp->capacity) > 4) &&
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status Ewan D. Milne
7 siblings, 2 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
sd_read_capacity_10() and sd_read_capacity_16() do not check for underflow
and can extract invalid (e.g. zero) data when a malfunctioning device does
not actually transfer any data, but returnes a good status otherwise.
Check for this and retry, and log a message and return -EINVAL if we can't
get the capacity information.
We encountered a device that did this once but returned good data afterwards.
See similar commit 5cd3bbfad088 ("[SCSI] retry with missing data for INQUIRY")
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index acd79e9a0d82..6066f5c92c74 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2638,6 +2638,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
[13] = RC16_LEN,
};
struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ int count, resid;
struct scsi_failure failure_defs[] = {
/*
* Do not retry Invalid Command Operation Code or Invalid
@@ -2688,6 +2689,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
};
const struct scsi_exec_args exec_args = {
.sshdr = &sshdr,
+ .resid = &resid,
.failures = &failures,
};
int sense_valid = 0;
@@ -2699,11 +2701,23 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
if (sdp->no_read_capacity_16)
return -EINVAL;
- memset(buffer, 0, RC16_LEN);
+ for (count = 0; count < 3; ++count) {
+ memset(buffer, 0, RC16_LEN);
- the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, buffer,
- RC16_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT, sdkp->max_retries,
- &exec_args);
+ the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN,
+ buffer, RC16_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT,
+ sdkp->max_retries, &exec_args);
+
+ if (the_result == 0 && resid == RC16_LEN) {
+ /*
+ * if nothing was transferred, we try
+ * again. It's a workaround for a broken
+ * device.
+ */
+ continue;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
if (the_result > 0) {
if (media_not_present(sdkp, &sshdr))
@@ -2727,6 +2741,12 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (resid == RC16_LEN) {
+ sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp,
+ "Read Capacity(16) returned good status but no data");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
sector_size = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[8]);
lba = get_unaligned_be64(&buffer[0]);
@@ -2759,11 +2779,17 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
return sector_size;
}
+#define RC10_LEN 8
+#if RC10_LEN > SD_BUF_SIZE
+#error RC10_LEN must not be more than SD_BUF_SIZE
+#endif
+
static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
unsigned char *buffer)
{
static const u8 cmd[10] = { READ_CAPACITY };
struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ int count, resid;
struct scsi_failure failure_defs[] = {
/* Do not retry Medium Not Present */
{
@@ -2798,17 +2824,30 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
};
const struct scsi_exec_args exec_args = {
.sshdr = &sshdr,
+ .resid = &resid,
.failures = &failures,
};
int the_result;
sector_t lba;
unsigned sector_size;
- memset(buffer, 0, 8);
+ for (count = 0; count < 3; ++count) {
+ memset(buffer, 0, RC10_LEN);
- the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, buffer,
- 8, SD_TIMEOUT, sdkp->max_retries,
- &exec_args);
+ the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN,
+ buffer, RC10_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT,
+ sdkp->max_retries, &exec_args);
+
+ if (the_result == 0 && resid == RC10_LEN) {
+ /*
+ * if nothing was transferred, we try
+ * again. It's a workaround for a broken
+ * device.
+ */
+ continue;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
if (the_result > 0) {
if (media_not_present(sdkp, &sshdr))
@@ -2821,6 +2860,12 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (resid == RC10_LEN) {
+ sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp,
+ "Read Capacity(10) returned good status but no data");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
sector_size = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[4]);
lba = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[0]);
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun()
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:56 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status Ewan D. Milne
7 siblings, 2 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
Make code congruent with similar code in read_capacity_16()/read_capacity_10().
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
index c754b1d566e0..9527b8fc5262 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@@ -717,14 +717,13 @@ static int scsi_probe_lun(struct scsi_device *sdev, unsigned char *inq_result,
"scsi scan: INQUIRY %s with code 0x%x\n",
result ? "failed" : "successful", result));
- if (result == 0) {
+ if (result == 0 && resid == try_inquiry_len) {
/*
* if nothing was transferred, we try
* again. It's a workaround for some USB
* devices.
*/
- if (resid == try_inquiry_len)
- continue;
+ continue;
}
break;
}
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun() Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-15 21:15 ` Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:59 ` Damien Le Moal
7 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Ewan D. Milne @ 2025-08-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
This is used to test the earlier read_capacity_10()/16() retry patch.
Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
index 353cb60e1abe..6239783bef21 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ struct tape_block {
#define SDEBUG_OPT_NO_CDB_NOISE 0x4000
#define SDEBUG_OPT_HOST_BUSY 0x8000
#define SDEBUG_OPT_CMD_ABORT 0x10000
+#define SDEBUG_OPT_NO_DATA 0x20000
#define SDEBUG_OPT_ALL_NOISE (SDEBUG_OPT_NOISE | SDEBUG_OPT_Q_NOISE | \
SDEBUG_OPT_RESET_NOISE)
#define SDEBUG_OPT_ALL_INJECTING (SDEBUG_OPT_RECOVERED_ERR | \
@@ -237,7 +238,8 @@ struct tape_block {
SDEBUG_OPT_DIF_ERR | SDEBUG_OPT_DIX_ERR | \
SDEBUG_OPT_SHORT_TRANSFER | \
SDEBUG_OPT_HOST_BUSY | \
- SDEBUG_OPT_CMD_ABORT)
+ SDEBUG_OPT_CMD_ABORT | \
+ SDEBUG_OPT_NO_DATA)
#define SDEBUG_OPT_RECOV_DIF_DIX (SDEBUG_OPT_RECOVERED_ERR | \
SDEBUG_OPT_DIF_ERR | SDEBUG_OPT_DIX_ERR)
@@ -1633,7 +1635,7 @@ static int make_ua(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, struct sdebug_dev_info *devip)
static int fill_from_dev_buffer(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, unsigned char *arr,
int arr_len)
{
- int act_len;
+ int act_len, resid;
struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb = &scp->sdb;
if (!sdb->length)
@@ -1641,9 +1643,18 @@ static int fill_from_dev_buffer(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, unsigned char *arr,
if (scp->sc_data_direction != DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
return DID_ERROR << 16;
- act_len = sg_copy_from_buffer(sdb->table.sgl, sdb->table.nents,
- arr, arr_len);
- scsi_set_resid(scp, scsi_bufflen(scp) - act_len);
+ /*
+ * Conditionally suppress DATA IN transfer and leave resid set to bufflen.
+ */
+ if (unlikely((sdebug_opts & SDEBUG_OPT_NO_DATA) &&
+ atomic_read(&sdeb_inject_pending))) {
+ resid = scsi_bufflen(scp);
+ } else {
+ act_len = sg_copy_from_buffer(sdb->table.sgl, sdb->table.nents,
+ arr, arr_len);
+ resid = scsi_bufflen(scp) - act_len;
+ }
+ scsi_set_resid(scp, resid);
return 0;
}
@@ -1656,7 +1667,7 @@ static int fill_from_dev_buffer(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, unsigned char *arr,
static int p_fill_from_dev_buffer(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, const void *arr,
int arr_len, unsigned int off_dst)
{
- unsigned int act_len, n;
+ unsigned int act_len, n, resid;
struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb = &scp->sdb;
off_t skip = off_dst;
@@ -1665,13 +1676,23 @@ static int p_fill_from_dev_buffer(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, const void *arr,
if (scp->sc_data_direction != DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
return DID_ERROR << 16;
- act_len = sg_pcopy_from_buffer(sdb->table.sgl, sdb->table.nents,
- arr, arr_len, skip);
- pr_debug("%s: off_dst=%u, scsi_bufflen=%u, act_len=%u, resid=%d\n",
- __func__, off_dst, scsi_bufflen(scp), act_len,
- scsi_get_resid(scp));
- n = scsi_bufflen(scp) - (off_dst + act_len);
- scsi_set_resid(scp, min_t(u32, scsi_get_resid(scp), n));
+ /*
+ * Conditionally suppress DATA IN transfer and leave resid set to bufflen.
+ */
+ if (unlikely((sdebug_opts & SDEBUG_OPT_NO_DATA) &&
+ atomic_read(&sdeb_inject_pending))) {
+ resid = scsi_bufflen(scp);
+ } else {
+ act_len = sg_pcopy_from_buffer(sdb->table.sgl, sdb->table.nents,
+ arr, arr_len, skip);
+ pr_debug("%s: off_dst=%u, scsi_bufflen=%u, act_len=%u, resid=%d\n",
+ __func__, off_dst, scsi_bufflen(scp), act_len,
+ scsi_get_resid(scp));
+ n = scsi_bufflen(scp) - (off_dst + act_len);
+ resid = min_t(u32, scsi_get_resid(scp), n);
+ }
+ scsi_set_resid(scp, resid);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This does not change any behavior (since .ascq was initialized to 0 by
> the compiler) but makes explicit that the entry in the scsi_failures
> array does not handle cases where ASCQ is nonzero, consistent with other
> usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Looks goo to me.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This makes the handling in read_capacity_10() consistent with other
> cases, e.g. sd_spinup_disk(). Omitting .ascq in scsi_failure did not
> result in wildcard matching, it only handled ASCQ 0x00. This patch
> changes the retry behavior, we no longer retry 3 times on ASC 0x3a
> if a nonzero ASCQ is ever returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Looks OK.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This has read_capacity_16 have scsi-ml retry errors instead of driving
> them itself.
>
> There are 2 behavior changes with this patch:
> 1. There is one behavior change where we no longer retry when
> scsi_execute_cmd returns < 0, but we should be ok. We don't need to retry
> for failures like the queue being removed, and for the case where there
> are no tags/reqs since the block layer waits/retries for us. For possible
> memory allocation failures from blk_rq_map_kern we use GFP_NOIO, so
> retrying will probably not help.
> 2. For the specific UAs we checked for and retried, we would get
> READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET retries plus whatever retries were left
> from the main loop's retries. Each UA now gets
> READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET reties, and the other errors get up to 3
> retries. This is most likely ok, because READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET
> is already 10 and is not based on anything specific like a spec or
> device, so the extra 3 we got from the main loop was probably just an
> accident and is not going to help.
>
> Original patch by Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> modified
> based upon review comments for an earlier version of this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Looks OK.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error() Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> read_capacity_10() sets "sense_valid" in a different conditional statement prior to
> calling read_capacity_error(), and does not use this value otherwise. Move the call
> to scsi_sense_valid() to read_capacity_error() instead of passing it as a parameter
> from read_capacity_16() and read_capacity_10().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Does this maybe need a Fixes tag ?
Regardless, looks OK to me.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() because this value has not
> been returned to it since commit 72deb455b5ec ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF").
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
1 sibling, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> sd_read_capacity_10() and sd_read_capacity_16() do not check for underflow
> and can extract invalid (e.g. zero) data when a malfunctioning device does
> not actually transfer any data, but returnes a good status otherwise.
s/returnes/returns
> Check for this and retry, and log a message and return -EINVAL if we can't
> get the capacity information.
Hmmm. A little unclear explanation: "and retry, and log a message and return
-EINVAL"... hard to parse.
>
> We encountered a device that did this once but returned good data afterwards.
>
> See similar commit 5cd3bbfad088 ("[SCSI] retry with missing data for INQUIRY")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
A couple of nits below to make the code cleaner.
With that,
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index acd79e9a0d82..6066f5c92c74 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2638,6 +2638,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> [13] = RC16_LEN,
> };
> struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
> + int count, resid;
> struct scsi_failure failure_defs[] = {
> /*
> * Do not retry Invalid Command Operation Code or Invalid
> @@ -2688,6 +2689,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> };
> const struct scsi_exec_args exec_args = {
> .sshdr = &sshdr,
> + .resid = &resid,
> .failures = &failures,
> };
> int sense_valid = 0;
> @@ -2699,11 +2701,23 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> if (sdp->no_read_capacity_16)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - memset(buffer, 0, RC16_LEN);
> + for (count = 0; count < 3; ++count) {
> + memset(buffer, 0, RC16_LEN);
>
> - the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, buffer,
> - RC16_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT, sdkp->max_retries,
> - &exec_args);
> + the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN,
> + buffer, RC16_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT,
> + sdkp->max_retries, &exec_args);
> +
> + if (the_result == 0 && resid == RC16_LEN) {
> + /*
> + * if nothing was transferred, we try
> + * again. It's a workaround for a broken
> + * device.
> + */
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
Maybe reverse the condition to avoid this break and the continue ? E.g.:
/*
* If nothing was transferred, we try again. It is a workaround
* for some buggy devices or SAT which sometimes do not return
* data on the first try.
*/
if (the_result || resid != RC16_LEN)
break;
I find this simpler and cleaner :)
> + }
>
> if (the_result > 0) {
> if (media_not_present(sdkp, &sshdr))
> @@ -2727,6 +2741,12 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (resid == RC16_LEN) {
> + sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp,
> + "Read Capacity(16) returned good status but no data");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> sector_size = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[8]);
> lba = get_unaligned_be64(&buffer[0]);
>
[...]
> @@ -2798,17 +2824,30 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> };
> const struct scsi_exec_args exec_args = {
> .sshdr = &sshdr,
> + .resid = &resid,
> .failures = &failures,
> };
> int the_result;
> sector_t lba;
> unsigned sector_size;
>
> - memset(buffer, 0, 8);
> + for (count = 0; count < 3; ++count) {
> + memset(buffer, 0, RC10_LEN);
>
> - the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, buffer,
> - 8, SD_TIMEOUT, sdkp->max_retries,
> - &exec_args);
> + the_result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdp, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN,
> + buffer, RC10_LEN, SD_TIMEOUT,
> + sdkp->max_retries, &exec_args);
> +
> + if (the_result == 0 && resid == RC10_LEN) {
> + /*
> + * if nothing was transferred, we try
> + * again. It's a workaround for a broken
> + * device.
> + */
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
Same suggestion here as above.
> + }
>
> if (the_result > 0) {
> if (media_not_present(sdkp, &sshdr))
> @@ -2821,6 +2860,12 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (resid == RC10_LEN) {
> + sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp,
> + "Read Capacity(10) returned good status but no data");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> sector_size = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[4]);
> lba = get_unaligned_be32(&buffer[0]);
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun() Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:56 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
1 sibling, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> Make code congruent with similar code in read_capacity_16()/read_capacity_10().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index c754b1d566e0..9527b8fc5262 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -717,14 +717,13 @@ static int scsi_probe_lun(struct scsi_device *sdev, unsigned char *inq_result,
> "scsi scan: INQUIRY %s with code 0x%x\n",
> result ? "failed" : "successful", result));
>
> - if (result == 0) {
> + if (result == 0 && resid == try_inquiry_len) {
> /*
> * if nothing was transferred, we try
> * again. It's a workaround for some USB
> * devices.
> */
> - if (resid == try_inquiry_len)
> - continue;
> + continue;
> }
Maybe make this:
/*
* If nothing was transferred, we try again. It is a workaround
* for some buggy USB devices.
*/
if (result == 0 && resid == try_inquiry_len)
continue;
With that,
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status Ewan D. Milne
@ 2025-08-16 0:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-20 11:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 31+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-16 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This is used to test the earlier read_capacity_10()/16() retry patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Looks OK, but it would be nice to be able to suppress the data only for the
first X commands, so that the retires can be exercised with a success in them
instead of all of them failing to give data.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:36 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-19 19:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2025-08-19 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 2:15 PM, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This does not change any behavior (since .ascq was initialized to 0 by
> the compiler) but makes explicit that the entry in the scsi_failures
> array does not handle cases where ASCQ is nonzero, consistent with other
> usage.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:37 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-19 19:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2025-08-19 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 2:15 PM, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This makes the handling in read_capacity_10() consistent with other
> cases, e.g. sd_spinup_disk(). Omitting .ascq in scsi_failure did not
> result in wildcard matching, it only handled ASCQ 0x00. This patch
> changes the retry behavior, we no longer retry 3 times on ASC 0x3a
> if a nonzero ASCQ is ever returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 78f5903cc8d0..e3b802b26f0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2729,11 +2729,13 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> {
> .sense = UNIT_ATTENTION,
> .asc = 0x3A,
> + .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY,
> .result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
> },
> {
> .sense = NOT_READY,
> .asc = 0x3A,
> + .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY,
> .result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
> },
> /* Device reset might occur several times so retry a lot */
If this patch is reposted, please consider shortening the title of this
patch to e.g. "Do not retry ASC 0x3a". Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:42 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-19 19:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2025-08-19 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 2:15 PM, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This has read_capacity_16 have scsi-ml retry errors instead of driving
> them itself.
>
> There are 2 behavior changes with this patch:
> 1. There is one behavior change where we no longer retry when
> scsi_execute_cmd returns < 0, but we should be ok. We don't need to retry
> for failures like the queue being removed, and for the case where there
> are no tags/reqs since the block layer waits/retries for us. For possible
> memory allocation failures from blk_rq_map_kern we use GFP_NOIO, so
> retrying will probably not help.
> 2. For the specific UAs we checked for and retried, we would get
> READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET retries plus whatever retries were left
> from the main loop's retries. Each UA now gets
> READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET reties, and the other errors get up to 3
> retries. This is most likely ok, because READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET
> is already 10 and is not based on anything specific like a spec or
> device, so the extra 3 we got from the main loop was probably just an
> accident and is not going to help.
>
> Original patch by Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> modified
> based upon review comments for an earlier version of this patch.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:44 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2025-08-19 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 2:15 PM, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> read_capacity_10() sets "sense_valid" in a different conditional statement prior to
> calling read_capacity_error(), and does not use this value otherwise. Move the call
> to scsi_sense_valid() to read_capacity_error() instead of passing it as a parameter
> from read_capacity_16() and read_capacity_10().
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2025-08-19 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 2:15 PM, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() because this value has not
> been returned to it since commit 72deb455b5ec ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF").
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data
2025-08-16 0:53 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-19 19:40 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2025-08-19 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Damien Le Moal, Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert
On 8/15/25 5:53 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> + if (the_result == 0 && resid == RC16_LEN) {
>> + /*
>> + * if nothing was transferred, we try
>> + * again. It's a workaround for a broken
>> + * device.
>> + */
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + break;
>
> Maybe reverse the condition to avoid this break and the continue ? E.g.:
>
> /*
> * If nothing was transferred, we try again. It is a workaround
> * for some buggy devices or SAT which sometimes do not return
> * data on the first try.
> */
> if (the_result || resid != RC16_LEN)
> break;
>
> I find this simpler and cleaner :)
+1
Bart.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:28 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 23:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This does not change any behavior (since .ascq was initialized to 0 by
> the compiler) but makes explicit that the entry in the scsi_failures
> array does not handle cases where ASCQ is nonzero, consistent with other
> usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 2 ++
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:34 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 23:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This makes the handling in read_capacity_10() consistent with other
> cases, e.g. sd_spinup_disk(). Omitting .ascq in scsi_failure did not
> result in wildcard matching, it only handled ASCQ 0x00. This patch
> changes the retry behavior, we no longer retry 3 times on ASC 0x3a
> if a nonzero ASCQ is ever returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:37 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2025-08-20 11:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 23:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> This has read_capacity_16 have scsi-ml retry errors instead of driving
> them itself.
>
> There are 2 behavior changes with this patch:
> 1. There is one behavior change where we no longer retry when
> scsi_execute_cmd returns < 0, but we should be ok. We don't need to retry
> for failures like the queue being removed, and for the case where there
> are no tags/reqs since the block layer waits/retries for us. For possible
> memory allocation failures from blk_rq_map_kern we use GFP_NOIO, so
> retrying will probably not help.
> 2. For the specific UAs we checked for and retried, we would get
> READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET retries plus whatever retries were left
> from the main loop's retries. Each UA now gets
> READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET reties, and the other errors get up to 3
> retries. This is most likely ok, because READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET
> is already 10 and is not based on anything specific like a spec or
> device, so the extra 3 we got from the main loop was probably just an
> accident and is not going to help.
>
> Original patch by Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> modified
> based upon review comments for an earlier version of this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 23:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> read_capacity_10() sets "sense_valid" in a different conditional statement prior to
> calling read_capacity_error(), and does not use this value otherwise. Move the call
> to scsi_sense_valid() to read_capacity_error() instead of passing it as a parameter
> from read_capacity_16() and read_capacity_10().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 23:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() because this value has not
> been returned to it since commit 72deb455b5ec ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF").
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:53 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
1 sibling, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 23:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> sd_read_capacity_10() and sd_read_capacity_16() do not check for underflow
> and can extract invalid (e.g. zero) data when a malfunctioning device does
> not actually transfer any data, but returnes a good status otherwise.
> Check for this and retry, and log a message and return -EINVAL if we can't
> get the capacity information.
>
> We encountered a device that did this once but returned good data afterwards.
>
> See similar commit 5cd3bbfad088 ("[SCSI] retry with missing data for INQUIRY")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun()
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:56 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
1 sibling, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi; +Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche, dlemoal
On 8/15/25 23:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> Make code congruent with similar code in read_capacity_16()/read_capacity_10().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status
2025-08-16 0:59 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-08-20 11:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2025-08-20 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Damien Le Moal, Ewan D. Milne, linux-scsi
Cc: michael.christie, dgilbert, bvanassche
On 8/16/25 02:59, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
>> This is used to test the earlier read_capacity_10()/16() retry patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
>
> Looks OK, but it would be nice to be able to suppress the data only for the
> first X commands, so that the retires can be exercised with a success in them
> instead of all of them failing to give data.
>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
>
>
Seconded. The patches expect the device to return valid data after
retry, so we should be checking for that scenario in scsi_debug, too.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-20 11:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-15 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] Retry READ CAPACITY(10)/(16) with good status but no data Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: Explicitly specify .ascq = 0x00 for ASC 0x28/0x29 scsi_failures Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] scsi: sd: Explicitly specify .ascq = SCMD_FAILURE_ASCQ_ANY for ASC 0x3a Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] scsi: sd: Have scsi-ml retry read_capacity_16 errors Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] scsi: sd: Avoid passing potentially uninitialized "sense_valid" to read_capacity_error() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] scsi: sd: Remove checks for -EOVERFLOW in sd_read_capacity() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: sd: Check for and retry in case of READ_CAPCITY(10)/(16) returning no data Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-19 19:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] scsi: Simplify nested if conditional in scsi_probe_lun() Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:56 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-20 11:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-15 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status Ewan D. Milne
2025-08-16 0:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-20 11:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).