From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:56:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251031095643.74246-5-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251031095643.74246-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.
This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request
alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.
With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU.
Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
index 3a821afee9bc..987befb02408 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
@@ -441,7 +441,8 @@ static int fc_host_setup(struct transport_container *tc, struct device *dev,
fc_host->next_vport_number = 0;
fc_host->npiv_vports_inuse = 0;
- fc_host->work_q = alloc_workqueue("fc_wq_%d", 0, 0, shost->host_no);
+ fc_host->work_q = alloc_workqueue("fc_wq_%d", WQ_PERCPU, 0,
+ shost->host_no);
if (!fc_host->work_q)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3088,7 +3089,7 @@ fc_remote_port_create(struct Scsi_Host *shost, int channel,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
- rport->devloss_work_q = alloc_workqueue("fc_dl_%d_%d", 0, 0,
+ rport->devloss_work_q = alloc_workqueue("fc_dl_%d_%d", WQ_PERCPU, 0,
shost->host_no, rport->number);
if (!rport->devloss_work_q) {
printk(KERN_ERR "FC Remote Port alloc_workqueue failed\n");
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 9:56 [PATCH 0/4] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-10-31 9:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-10-31 9:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: qla2xxx: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2025-10-31 9:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: " Marco Crivellari
2025-10-31 9:56 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-11-03 18:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: " Justin Tee
2025-11-13 2:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Martin K. Petersen
2025-11-13 8:55 ` Marco Crivellari
2025-11-20 4:15 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251031095643.74246-5-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox